Alase, List: Yes. I shipped my reply to Claudio with an attachment too extensive for to be distributed, according to the Lyris Administrator. The attachment contained a work that Michel Balat sent me 6 years ago, entitled 'Sur le pragmatisme de Peirce ¨ l'usage des psychistes'. Since Claudio had
Claudio, 2.457-458 are not paragraphs. See A Sketch of Logical Critics on EP 2, pages 451 to 462. J. LuracClaudio Guerri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Joe, Ben, Jim, List thanks for all information I could not find 'A Sketch of Logical Critics', EP 2.457-458, 1911 because (I
Hi, Joe,
I don't know, maybe you've seen straight through to Calvino's "formula," such
that the technique is too obvious to you or something like that. But you also
say that you have trouble getting a "firm footing."
I doubt that my wide reading (it's not _that_ wide) has that much to do with m
In response to me saying:.
>Maybe I should add that I find it difficult to believe that anyone has
>actually been able to read all of the way through Calvino's practical joke
>of a book!
Ben says:
It's also difficult to believe that anyone eats all the way through a rich,
multi-layered Italia
Dear Luis and List,
Sorry. I thought this was an off-list post.
Gary
Gary Richmond wrote:
Dear Luis,
Thanks for your comments. While the discussion was taking place on
Peirce-l I half thought you'd post something (I could have used your
help!) But now I see you were away during th
Dear Luis,
Thanks for your comments. While the discussion was taking place on
Peirce-l I half thought you'd post something (I could have used your
help!) But now I see you were away during the exchange. I think
Jean-Marc Orliaguet likes to "debate" while I prefer to "inquire," and
I don't thin
Dear Gary,
You are completly right when you say that each diagram stresses some
dimensions of semiotic processes.
Indeed, today I would complement that the Icon, Index and Symbol, can be
both a classificatory scheme (tree classes) or a dimension in a broader
set of classes (10 or more classes). T
