Ben
I've been there, even if for different reasons. You'll be welcome when you return.
Cheers and all the best
Arnold
On 9/13/06, Jim Piat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know the feeling, Ben. I look forward to your return. All the best! Let me know if I can be of any practical help.
Jim Piat
and Italian. With introductions and notes
. New York
, Collier [c1910] Series: The Harvard classics, 32.
It's also available on the Web, with a few minor typos.Just flying a kite, folks ...
Cheers
Arnold Shepperson
---
Message from peirce-l forum to subscriber archive@mail-archive.com
to work with in a form of co-operative learning, all got distinctions for their dissertations!
Cheers
Arnold Shepperson
---
Message from peirce-l forum to subscriber archive@mail-archive.com
, it's as easy as slicing bread! By all means get the Intelex edition - you'll not regret it.
Cheers
Arnold Shepperson
---
Message from peirce-l forum to subscriber archive@mail-archive.com
Vinicius
What a fabulous group of scholars you have for your thesis defense!! Wish I could be there; just thinking of these and all the other names mentioned makes my mouth water. I look forward to subsequent discussion on the List ...
Cheers
Arnold Shepperson
---
Message from peirce-l forum
, but haven't had a respone yet.
Cheers
Arnold Shepperson
---
Message from peirce-l forum to subscriber archive@mail-archive.com
Inna
Great to have your input again. Were you off the list, or just lurking?
cheers
Arnold Shepperson
On 7/17/06, Inna Semetsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Jerry and Listlong time...to add to Jerry's post: Peirce was referenced at the Whitehead conference
not only in philosophical papersbut
Peter
Nice to hear from you. I guess almost anybody who regularly reads English media will have heard of Soros. It seems that the servers at Google also have plenty of links to Soros-related stuff: my G-mail browser has supplied a whole lot of links!
Cheers
Arnold Shepperson
---
Message from
Ben, Patrck, List
BU = Ben Udell
AS = Arnold Shepperson
BU: Peirce said that mathematics is the science which _draws_ necessary conclusions, as opposed to its being a science _of_ necessary conclusions. The science _of_ reasoning, necessary and otherwise, he called logic and placed
of which is well enough known.
Cheers
Arnold Shepperson
---
Message from peirce-l forum to subscriber archive@mail-archive.com
Jerry, List
JC: Jerry Chandler
AS: Arnold Shepperson
On 4/22/06, Jerry Chandler wrote:
JC: Ipresuppose that most readers of this list will find these statements to clash with their philosophy of physics, the philosophy of genera. I can merely add that the symbol system of physics
Joe
I also discovered this a few days ago, but didn't say anything because I figured I was just being dumb ...
Anyway: the G-mail spam filter is pretty powerful, so I'm making it a habit of checking it 2-3 times a week from now on, because it's easier to get the right stuff back from the spam
Darrel, Gary
First to Darrel: welcome.
To both: one wouldn't call Agnes Heller a Peircean, but in her A Radical Philosophy of 1985, she characterises philosophy as the intellectual activity that is afraid neither ask nor to confront `childish questions'. In many respects, though, I think that
Whoops! A small correction: I should have concluded by saying that I am UNABLE to say whether the students followed my example any better than before!
AS
---
Message from peirce-l forum to subscriber archive@mail-archive.com
Gary, List
It's actually quite amusing to see how people are speaking of a `papradigm shift' in the universities, when the very concept of a `paradigm' is rooted in the question of what exemplars (i.e. paradigms) to employ in
teaching the public about science. My take on this topic comes from
15 matches
Mail list logo
