[peirce-l] Re: What "fundamental psychological laws" is Peirce referring to?

2006-10-04 Thread Eugene Halton
Bill Bailey earthlink.net> writes: Sept 29: ��Levi-Strauss argues that there is no real difference in terms of complexity between "primitive" and scientific thought; he found the primitive's categories and structurings in botany, for example, to be as complex as any western textbook might

[peirce-l] Re: Death of Arnold Shepperson

2006-10-02 Thread Eugene Halton
I am very sorry to hear of Arnold's death and send my condolences. He will be missed. Gene Halton --- Message from peirce-l forum to subscriber archive@mail-archive.com

[peirce-l] Re: What "fundamental psychological laws" is Peirce referring to?

2006-09-27 Thread Eugene Halton
Kirsti Mtt��nen saunalahti.fi> writes: > > Dear Eugene, > > Thanks for an inspiring mail. The idea of a progressively broadening > social conception I find a very fruitful one, enriching the idea of a > logical ordering. This, together with your exhilarating > thought-experiment with an e

[peirce-l] Re: What "fundamental psychological laws" is Peirce referring to?

2006-09-26 Thread Eugene Halton
Dear Joe, The ordering of the methods seems to me to be based on a progressively broadening social conception: 1 You believe what you believe. 2 You believe what you are forced by social power to believe or can force on others to believe. 3 You believe what you take to be intrinsically

[peirce-l] Re: Entelechy

2006-05-13 Thread Eugene Halton
May 13, 2005 Dear Kirsti, Thanks. Glad to hear you enjoyed those early articles. Re truth giving to beauty, see below. Dear Jeff, You ask how a poem can be an argument in Peirce’s sense, related to the context of him describing the universe as an argument that is necessarily…a great poem. Per

[peirce-l] Re: Entelechy

2006-05-09 Thread Eugene Halton
Kirsti M: “…The entelechy or perfection of being Peirce here refers to is something never attained to full, but strived at, again and again. Just as with science and scientific knowledge. It's about striving to approach, better and better, The Truth. If there ever would be an end, the absolute pe

[peirce-l] Re: evolving universe

2006-03-22 Thread Eugene Halton
Dear Gary and il-young son, Yes, I agree that Peirce saw Darwinian natural selection as corresponding to tychism, that is, as one modality of evolution, to which Peirce added two others, corresponding to his three categories and comprising a tri-modal model of evolution. As he said in "E

[peirce-l] Re: evolving universe

2006-03-20 Thread Eugene Halton
Dear Gary, Thanks for the link to Lee Smolin's piece. I enjoyed reading it. Then, stepping away from it, it occurred to me that comparing Darwin and Einstein, while taking from Peirce the idea that laws of nature are results of natural selection, represents no "dangerous ideas" at all, o

[peirce-l] Re: Heathening

2006-01-15 Thread Eugene Halton
Dear Joe, I realize you didn't want to go further in this discussion, but I just want to comment on something. Thanks for the definition of heathen, which, with its connection of religious beliefs to locale and landscape, actually could be taken as complimentary, just as the term civilization