[off-list]
Hi Ben,
Hey, what happened to your feedback on my paper? Anyhow, probably best
since I made some significant changes yesterday. BUT, will you be
available to edit and Springer-ize it in a week or so? Please let me
know so that if you can't I can set up contingency plans. If you
Ben, List,
Sorry, by the time I finished the email Inadvertently posted to the
list, I'd forgotten I hadn't changed the address to yours.
Well, since I'm here, 2 small errata: Correia "has NOT given permission
for
distribution" and Karl-Erich Wolff "assures (not 'assumes') me that
the
Jerry,
Gary Richmond's view doesn't technically contradict Gary F.'s statements, since
Gary F.'s statements were qualified by the possibility of somebody's producing
evidence, though Gary F. obviously seemed doubtful about the idea of the
chemical connection. I felt kind of doubtful too,
On May 12, 2006, at 1:05 AM, Peirce Discussion Forum digest wrote:
Off-list, Gary Richmond, who's quite busy, sent me this:
66~~
Chemistry expresses itself in Peirce's valency theory (the term is
not his
but Ken Ketner's who hasn't been given enough credit yet for his
work in
