Sung,
I am glad, that my post you did not find too inadequate, as I have not yet read your attachment (with my old computer that cannot read DOCX- So I will go to the internet-cafe). I am not sure about what I wrote- that reflexion turns time around (virtually, in the mind), and also provides
Helmut - try EP:2, pp 480-481. And the CP, Vol. 8, ..all the parts to Lady
Welby.
See also an interesting article:
http://see.library.utoronto.ca/SEED/Vol6-1/Farias_Queiroz.pdf
Edwina
- Original Message -
From: Helmut Raulien
To: Sungchul Ji
Cc: biosemiotics ; PEIRCE-L
Dear Edwina, I meant, that time is reversed virtually, not really, and with virtually I meant as represented by the mind. But now I suspect, that the term virtually is not proper. I just meant, that the sequence of the real events (1. smelling, 2. eating) is the other way round than the sequence
Dear Edwina, I meant, that time is reversed virtually, not really, and with virtually I meant as represented by the mind. But now I suspect, that the term virtually is not proper. I just meant, that the sequence of the real events (1. smelling, 2. eating) is the other way round than the
Thank you, Edwina! Sorry for my mistake: When in reality a wolf smells a rabbit, and then eats it, and a ranger sees the eating wolf and thinks: The wolf must have smelled the rabbit, time is virtually reversed somehow, but not the categories.
Best,
Helmut
Edwina Taborsky tabor...@primus.ca
