I agree as well. As important may be observations of Deely and others who
have already taken large steps in liberating Peirce's thought. I think
there is some urgency in establishing a triadic perspective about which
there should be little debate.
amazon.com/author/stephenrose
On Sat, Apr 7,
List, I think, for example, before we further analyze which determines which, e.g. the FI the DI or not, we should first get to a clearer definition of "determination", also by looking how it is used today in mathematics: deterministic chaos versus non-deterministic. Is determination non-causal,
I strongly agree with Mike B and Gary R.
MB
I humbly suggest that intersection of interests is a more practical
domain of inquiry than trying to find where your interpretations differ.
GR
I have always thought... that those who want to promote Peirce's
philosophy in the world at large ought
Mike, Edwina, Jon, list,
Mike wrote: "Let's consider the entire world of Peirce aficionados, past
and present. There is a reason both of you [Edwina and Jon S] study and
feel so passionately about Peirce. I humbly suggest that intersection of
interests is a more practical domain of inquiry than
Hi Edwina, Jon,
I have changed the subject line. It would not bother me if
this is the only item on the thread.
Somehow, again, you two go hammer-and-tongs at one another.
Edwina, you know as well as any of us how closely Peirce tied
semiosis to
