Frances to Edwina and Listers---
Thanks for your most recent reply, but please allow me to dig a little more
into Peircean writings for some clarity on his ideas about idealism and
representamen. Let me read further on specifically what the difference might be
for Peirce between "idealist
Frances to Edwina and listers---
My search goes on for a Peircean approach to at least metaphysical being. In
response to your kind reply, consider some of my rambling tentative guesses,
but without any specific Peircean references. (The new lettered paras directly
below roughly refer to the
Edwina, list,
I find your dialogue between DOs very interesting, like in your examples some days ago, with the wind, water, and waves. Then I thought, maybe when there is such an interaction, the sign grows spatially: The DOs merge to one DO. Like, first, when there is only the wind but no
Helmut, list
Interesting. I continue to differentiate between the internal and
external - and also, between the local stimuli and non-local laws.
I agree that the Sign is a functional composition - but I consider
that it is also a spatial and temporal one. It exists and
Mike, Edwina, list,
I have worked out a different model. it is based on the three Peircean categories, and Stanley N. Salthe´s distinction between subsumption (which is the same or something closely related to classification), and composition. The result of it regarding the sign is, that the
Frances - thanks for your comments. I'll try to respond below
On Wed 11/04/18 10:13 PM , frances.ke...@sympatico.ca sent:
Frances in the wings to Edwina and listers---
1. Allow me to musingly guess, it perhaps may be the representamen
of phenomena that fully fills the whole
Mike, list -
Thanks for your supportive comments. I'll try to clear up some
points.
1] When I say that a degenerate mode of Thirdness is operating, I
don't mean that it excludes - within the whole triad - the other
modes. For example, with the bird beak - Let's say
Hi Edwina, List,
Thank you; I knew you would respond in a complete and
thoughtful manner. (I also apologize to Frances for responding
earlier in the thread and hijacking her more recent comment,
since I first asked the question and had been formulating a
Frances in the wings to Edwina and listers---
1. Allow me to musingly guess, it perhaps may be the representamen of phenomena
that fully fills the whole cosmic universe, allowing that there may also be
some primal phenomena that are not representamen, and that objects as signs
only fills a
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px; }
Mike - I sent a long response but it seems to have disappeared. I'll
try again.
First - I expect this response will be met with indifference or
sneers from the list but I maintain that there is nothing in my view
10 matches
Mail list logo
