Gary F., List:
GF: That rules out pantheism, but not, I think, panentheism, which (as I
understand it) holds that Nature is immanent in God, not the other way
round.
Hmm, my admittedly limited understanding of panentheism is that it affirms
God to be somehow both immanent and transcendant; so
Jon, thanks for this, and for your later post, which clears things up
considerably. Just a couple of responses:
JS: In R 843, he states that the NA pertains to "the Being whose Attributes
are, in the main, those usually ascribed to Him, Omniscience, Omnipotence,
Infinite Benignity, a Being
Gary F., List:
GF: My responses to your four questions and the rest of your post are
inserted into it below.
Thanks, I appreciate the feedback.
GF: It could be those, but it’s also possible that the reference is not
that specific; Peirce might even be referring to Pragmatism, or to his
Jon,
My responses to your four questions and the rest of your post are inserted into
it below.
Gary f.
From: Jon Alan Schmidt [mailto:jonalanschm...@gmail.com]
Sent: 8-Sep-16 21:40
List:
Returning to the four questions in my post that started this thread …
1. To what
Jon, list,
Jon, I fully understand why you want to return to the subject of the
original post in this thread, your four questions. Still, I've been
following this thread rather closely and wanted to comment on some recent
exchanges in it concerning the distinction between reality and existence
Helmust, list:
I don't think you know what it is you disagree with.
Best,
Jerry R
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Helmut Raulien wrote:
> Jerry, list,
> On first glance I completely disagree. "First glance", because my
> contradiction may contain false suppositions about
Jerry, list,
On first glance I completely disagree. "First glance", because my contradiction may contain false suppositions about what your opinion might be like. Religion, I think, should always be connected with reason, otherwise it becomes dangerous. Dangerous as well is to look for
Jon, list:
They are all consistent.
What is analogical reasoning but saying one thing in terms of another?
essence and esse
Subject and predicate
Father and Son
Non-being and being
Agent and patient
First and Second
ens originarium and ens necessarium
theologico-physico
name and