Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2012 10:28 AM
Subject: Re: [peirce-l] ORDINARY DISCOURSE AS THE FINAL CAUSE OF ALL
INTELLECTUAL ENDEAVORS
Gary, Phyllis, list,
The use of ambiguity and precision or clarity as antonyms is what I. A.
Richards might have called a killer dichotomy[1] which doesn't recognize
to communicate on the same plain of actual existence.
Regards,
Gary
*From: * Benjamin Udell bud...@nyc.rr.com
*To: * PEIRCE-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU
*Sent: * Saturday, May 12, 2012 2:10 PM
*Subject: * Re: [peirce-l] ORDINARY DISCOURSE AS THE FINAL CAUSE OF
ALL INTELLECTUAL ENDEAVORS
Gary M., list
Moore
From: Phyllis Chiasson ath...@olympus.net
To: 'Gary Moore' gottlos752...@yahoo.com; PEIRCE-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 5:14 PM
Subject: RE: [peirce-l] ORDINARY DISCOURSE AS THE FINAL CAUSE OF ALL
INTELLECTUAL ENDEAVORS
Dear Gary,
Since language only has meaning within
Gary, Phyllis, list,
The use of ambiguity and precision or clarity as antonyms is what
I. A. Richards might have called a killer dichotomy[1] which doesn't
recognize they are all on the continuum of discourse academic as well as
ordinary. Before a more precise term can be used by more than
not know about?
Regards,
Gary Moore
From: John Harvey johnhar...@earthlink.net
To: Peirce-L peirce-l@listserv.iupui.edu
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2012 10:28 AM
Subject: Re: [peirce-l] ORDINARY DISCOURSE AS THE FINAL CAUSE OF ALL
INTELLECTUAL ENDEAVORS
Gary, Phyllis, list,
The use of ambiguity
@listserv.iupui.edu
*Sent:* Saturday, May 12, 2012 10:28 AM
*Subject:* Re: [peirce-l] ORDINARY DISCOURSE AS THE FINAL CAUSE OF ALL
INTELLECTUAL ENDEAVORS
Gary, Phyllis, list,
The use of ambiguity and precision or clarity as antonyms is
what I. A. Richards might have called a killer dichotomy[1
