Re: Studies in Logic and Its Vicissitudes
At: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/8116
Irving All,
Between 1865 and 1870, C.S. Peirce had already begun to set out the rudiments
of an information-theoretic semantics for inquiry, communication, and thought
in general, along
Re: Peirce Preservation (Studies in Logic and Its Vicissitudes)
At: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/8116
Irving All,
The question of how logic, mathematics, phenomenology, and philosophy
in general relate to one another has come up again several times in
recent
Re: Peirce Papers Preservation
At: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/8116
Irving,
Turning to your list of points ...
IA: My points were -- to put them as simplistically and succinctly as
possible -- that:
IA: (a) _Studies in Logic_ did not get laid aside because of
Re: Peirce Preservation (Studies in Logic and Its Vicissitudes)
At: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/8116
IA = Irving Anellis (also, Intelligence Augmentation)
IA: Jon Awbrey wrote: I would tend to sort Frege more in a class with
Boole, De Morgan, Peirce, and
Jon Awbrey wrote: I would tend to sort Frege more in a class with
Boole, De Morgan, Peirce, and Schröder, since I have the sense when I
read them that they are all talking like mathematicians, not like
people who are alien to mathematics.
I would thoroughly concur.
Although Peirce had,
