At 5:53 PM 1/17/96, John William Hull wrote:
>On Wed, 17 Jan 1996, Doug Henwood wrote:
>
>> I find them to be influential, in pure or diluted form, in anti-development
>> NGO circles and among funders. Though deep ecology and ecofeminism are
>> reported to be at odds - DE being seen as macho (liv
Thanks for Mike Meeropol's contribution [PEN-L 2359;repeated at end]
Personally, I am not opposed to exploring what value theory
would look like if there were sources of value other than human
labour. This may seem heretical but my reasons are that I think
if this is done, we will discover what a
At 10:09 AM 1/17/96, Michael Perelman wrote:
>Here are my thoughts on censorship:
>
>I do not believe that free speech should be censored when that speech occurs
>in the public domain, such as publishing in books or broadcasting. I do not
>regard pen-l as the public domain. Instead, pen-l is a s
At 1:26 PM 1/17/96, Rodney Coates wrote:
>I thought this would be of interest to pen-l.
>
>Original message
>Just when you thought it was safe to come into the office (you know
>just after you've been granted tenure) bureaucratic specialists
On Wed, 17 Jan 1996, Doug Henwood wrote:
> I find them to be influential, in pure or diluted form, in anti-development
> NGO circles and among funders. Though deep ecology and ecofeminism are
> reported to be at odds - DE being seen as macho (living proof: Dave
> Foreman) - Shiva has been embrace
Peter came back with this:
>
>Rather than debate Bill point by point on PEN-L and bore the pants off
>people I'll take up the issue directly with Bill if I get the time.
>
it is always so easy to say "oh, i won't debate this openly b/c i will bore
people" especially after you have called a person
I thought this would be of interest to pen-l.
Original message
Just when you thought it was safe to come into the office (you know
just after you've been granted tenure) bureaucratic specialists
(b.s'ers for short) find a way to screw up you
I promised at the outset that I wasn't going to engage Jim Devine in
another long PEN-L debate, and I'm sticking to that promise, so I
won't address Jim's recent posts anent my ASSA paper point by point.
I'll just offer the following comments and refer those interested in
what the paper reall
At 10:02 AM 1/17/96, James Devine wrote:
>I think the Marxian "meta-economic vision" or "problematic" or
>whatever you want to call it almost automatically implies that the
>concept of "socially necessary abstract labor time" (i.e., value)
>is central to the political economy, helping us to addre
>
> What is the significance of this extraordinary revolt?
>It is the first collective rebellion, on a national level,
>against neo-liberalism. It is epoch-making. Beginning in mid-
>November as an almost corporatist reaction of the public
>service to the planned reform of the social security
At 10:44 AM 1/17/96, John William Hull wrote:
>Unlike Henwood, however, I'm not so sure how seriously to take
>all the Shiva-esque hoopla. I'm not at all convinced that many
>of her sort of ideas of anti-scientific rural romanticism have much
>influence in practical political circles. I see it
On Tue, 16 Jan 1996, Colin Danby wrote:
> > Henwood's reply ("Vandana Shiva Again"), which simply repeated his prior
> assertions at a heightened level of rudeness, is a good example of the kind
> of arrogant insularity that our last post took exception to.
I don't see Henwood's questioning of
Here are my thoughts on censorship:
I do not believe that free speech should be censored when that speech occurs
in the public domain, such as publishing in books or broadcasting. I do not
regard pen-l as the public domain. Instead, pen-l is a space created for
people to meet together to learn
Responding to Alan Freeman, and paraphrasing Richard Nixon, I
want to make one thing perfectly clear: just because I find the
_phrase_ "theory of value" to be muddled in the literature and
in academic discussion, it doesn't mean that I reject the
concept and usefulness of value or theories of
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: URGENT UPDATE FROM YALE GESO: Yale 'Trials & TA Lockout'
>
> January 13, 1996
>
> Dear Friends:
>
> Here's the latest on the Yale strike:
>
> This past Wednesday, 138 people were arrested for blocking the street in
> front of the Yal
Le Monde diplomatique:
The French Spark
by IGNACIO RAMONET
Previously published in El Pais, December 1995
'Society does not exist' affirmed Margaret
Thatcher, encouraged by the ultra-liberals of
Europe, from both left and right. In the
throes of the biggest social confron
> Date: Tue, 16 Jan 1996 17:45:47 -0800
> From: Global Exchange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Global Exch Urgent Action-Rocio Culebro Threatened
>
> January 16, 1996
>
> REQUEST FOR URGENT ACTION.
>
> ROCIO CULEBRO, TECHNICAL SECRETARY OF THE
> NATIONAL NETWORK OF CIVI
On Sun, 14 Jan 1996, James Devine wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Dec 1995, Doug Henwood wrote:> Yes yes yes! Thank you Michael.
> And not only does he keep the list going, he's somehow kept us free of
> infection by libertarians!<
>
>
> A. S. Fatemi responds >>I DISAGREE WITH DOUG BECAUSE I DON'T BELIEV
My friend, being told that I am out of your leftish league has made my
morning.
It's good to hear Bill state that he is supportive of trade unions in
public forums. I find PEN-L to be quite a public forum but perhaps that's
my miconception.
Rather than debate Bill point by point on PEN-L and bore the pants off
people I'll take up the issue directly with Bill if I get the ti
20 matches
Mail list logo
