Doug sent us the following excerpts from David Harvey's work:
>[from David Harvey, Justice, Nature, and the Geography of Difference, pp.
>188-191]
>
>...that they were and continue to be somehow "closer to nature" than we are
>(even Guha, it seem to me, falls into this trap).
>Luther Standing Bea
Harvey, Leibniz and Marx
David Harvey's "Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference" surely has
the distinction of being the only Marxist study of ecology to draw
inspiration from Gottfried Leibniz (1646-1716). While openly admitting that
Leibniz is a "deeply conservative theoretician in pol
". . .in a planned society the question can no longer be on what do a
majority of the people agree but what the largest single group is whose
members agree sufficiently to make unified direction of all affairs
possible; or, if no such group large enough to enforce its views exists, how
it can be c
ELECTRONIC SYSTEM FOR TRANSFER OF THE ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL
POWER TO THE PEOPLE
CONSUMERS OF ALL COUNTRIES, UNITE !
The peoples have no say.
All economic and political power is concentrated in the trans-
national corporations, their mass media monopoly and their
politicians.
And from their poi
Now that I've had the better part of a day to restore a modicum of sanity,
I want to say a couple of words that I hope will lead in a positive direction.
1) I will post my article tonight sans footnotes, which I don't really
believe in. Let PEN-:L judge whether John Bellamy Foster or Jim O'Connor
> Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 11:58:30 -0400
> To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: Louis Proyect <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [PEN-L:7204] jim o'connor on harvey review
> Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Michael Perelman:
> >Academic publishing, like posting to the Int
(an old thread)
I wrote:
>>> Schumpeter was neither an econometrician nor a mathematical economist. He
>>> _was_ a conservative but open-minded economist who learned a lot from
Marx.
>>> His belief that socialism -- by which he meant government planning of the
>>> economy -- is inevitable seems q
I am applying for some grant money from the State of Utah to
teach two "High Technology" courses on the internet. One is
my undergraduate course reading Marx's Capital which I have
been teaching now for several years, to be taught in the
Fall 2000. The other, in the Spring 2001, is a graduate
f
Dear Louis,
Thank you for your piece. I agree with all of it, particularly the emphasis
on materialism (including the materialist conception of nature). I am almost
done with a book on this subject, which I think will constitute a revolution
in the interpretation of Marx's thought, entitled MARX
>Lou,
> Monthly Review has an impact on politics
>that S&S or CNS does not? Where?
MR was widely read by radicals in the 1960s. It was sort of the theoretical
journal that was the counterpart to the activist newspaper The Guardian.
> Of course the standard response to you
>(which you ha
This is right, except that I'd say that the lion's share of the surplus
went to a very specific part of the north, i.e., to England.
At 03:05 PM 5/25/99 -0700, you wrote:
>Jim Devine's analysis would be correct if the surplus in the South would have
>been confined to that region. Much of the we
Jim Devine's analysis would be correct if the surplus in the South would have
been confined to that region. Much of the wealth generated by the slave
economy migrated to the north.
Jim Devine wrote:
> My reading is that the slaves did a hell of a lot of work (and in hell) but
> that a lot of we
Lou is raising that old riddle of the dialectic of theory and practice, not an easy
puzzle to solve.
The more technical and academic writing and analysis should not be stopped, but we
need more translation into the language , ideas and discourses of everyday people.
That is , popularization. T
Louis and list,
I thought the original response to James O'Connor, as broadcast over the
list, was intemperate and uncalled for, just on the basis of those parts of
O'Connor's original message that were included in the post. On top of that
it was, presumably, a private correspondence whose unfort
Lou,
Monthly Review has an impact on politics
that S&S or CNS does not? Where?
Of course the standard response to you
(which you have heard a million times) is what
about Marx's own writings? Now there were a
few put out as pamphlets or for more general
consumption. But most certainly
Ricardo:
>- The habitus (Bourdieu's term) of the academic is not, never will
>be that of the worker. To academics the most important goal is to
>excel within their own habitus; publication being the main strategy
>for success. While academic journals and books are
>hardly published with a vie
BLS DAILY REPORT, FRIDAY, MAY 21, 1999
RELEASED TODAY: Regional and state unemployment rates were relatively
stable in April. All four regions reported little change over the month,
and 42 states recorded shifts of 0.3 percentage point or less. The national
jobless rate was essentially unchang
> BLS DAILY REPORT, MONDAY, MAY 24, 1999
>
> The Midwest in April had the lowest unemployment rate of any region in the
> country at 3.4 percent, while the West had the highest at 5.1 percent. In
> the South, the April jobless rate was 4.1 percent, and in the Northeast it
> was 4.2 percent, BLS
My reading is that the slaves did a hell of a lot of work (and in hell) but
that a lot of went wasted, because the Civil War destroyed the South. With
Northern occupation preventing the normal process of rebuilding that takes
place after wars (fixing the railways), with Southern white insistence o
Hey, this partnership of church and state could be called neo-feudalism. Neat idea.
Ever seen those Marine commercials where a few good men are traced back in origin to
knights in armor ?
Charles Brown
>>> Jim Devine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/25/99 11:20AM >>>
> [Gore's] proposal for ``a new p
http://www.theatlantic.com/unbound/polipro/pp9905.htm
The Atlantic Monthly
May 12, 1999
Slaves' Wages
A work of history puts a price on slave labor -- and could be used to
determine modern-day reparations
by Jack Beatty
That Swiss banks are paying compensation to the families of Holocaust
s
Michael Perelman:
>Academic publishing, like posting to the Internet, only goes beyond personal
>gratification if it serves some larger purpose. In that sense, I think
that we
>might do well to pursue the matter.
Okay, Michael. Here's the problem. As much as I admire the books you've
produced ov
Louis Proyect wrote:
>For newcomers to PEN-L, it should be understood that Doug Henwood agrees
>with David Harvey. I am not sure on what basis, since Doug by his own
>admission has been moving away from Marxism while Harvey represents himself
>as trying to put it on new foundations. I myself thin
Doug Henwood:
>And your "review" of David Harvey in the RRPE was an embarrassment - beyond
>the realm of mere disagreement into the realm of serious misunderstanding.
>Harvey was trying to think seriously about the meanings of place and
>community - how sometimes these can be virtues and how somet
Copyright 1999 Ga*nne*tt Company, Inc.
U*SA TOADY
May 25, 1999, Tuesday, FIRST EDITION
SECTION: MONEY; Pg. 3B
LENGTH: 742 words
HEADLINE: Daley's road trip hits potholes U.S. tour hopes to give
trade a good name
BYLINE: James Cox
DATELINE: RACINE, Wis.
BODY:
RACINE, Wis. -- On the road
Louis Proyect wrote:
>Actually, after 12 hours I have achieved a certain epiphany around this
>question of academic journals and publishing houses that publish Marxish
>literature. This transcends my disgust with what I went through over the
>Harvey article submission. Since you are a professor y
Chapter One: On the Road with Fred and George
During the whole modern period of European history, the general direction of
social development was one of freeing the individual from the ties which had
bound him to the customary or prescribed ways in the pursuit of his ordinary
activities. On the d
(Not sure why the last message was screwed up. But here's a re-send. By the
way, Michael Perelman should tell us that the discussion is a waste of time
and urge us to wind it up. That would be music to my ears. Right now I feel
like discussing Yugoslavia, not this crap.)
Michael Keany:
>Maybe so.
Exactly. My question was how we could move beyond that. Right now I posting to
a list with 450 subscribers. Let's assume (falling into an economist's mode of
thought) that another hundred have access to it from various Internet sites. I
suspect maybe the majority of people will delete this wit
Enough already! Look, we already had the debate between Lou and Doug. I admire
both of you and hate to see this flame reignite.
I have profited from David Harvey's work, although I found last book
disappointing. I just completed a book by Jim O'Connor that I found quite
valuable.
We have no n
Actually, I think that Lou's initial accidental posting, while it was off base,
does serve a useful purpose -- once we remove the vituperative personal
material.
The discussion relates to Yugoslavia in the sense that we're all groping for a
way to improve society and to stop such criminal actions
Russia Today
Last updated: Tue, May 25 at Lon. 03:32 pm, Prague
05:32 pm,
N.Y. 11:32 am
Editor's Pick: Kosovo Crisis -- The latest updates
on the crisis in Yugoslavia.
NATO
At 10:55 PM 5/24/99 -0500, Carrol Cox wrote:
>Lou,
>
>I'm just recovering from a migraine and can't read this too carefully,
>but it seems to me that you are suggesting that the readers of a book review
>should already have read the book.
Actually, after 12 hours I have achieved a certain epipha
> [Gore's] proposal for ``a new partnership'' between church and state,
> outlined in a presidential campaign speech at a downtown
> Salvation Army, centered around the notion that ``politics and
> morality are deeply interrelated.''
we already live under a "partnership" of government and busin
Yah and PTL, Mike E.!
My olde school Rattlesnake U., home of the Golden Rattlers, could use a
little financial help for all of its years of bringing good news to the
heathens; not to mention millions of hours of good works trying to civilize
the inhabitants of the greater Mudsuck area. Hey,
That message to O'Connor was accidentally sent to Pen-l. Sorry for the
confusion.
At 07:18 PM 5/24/99 -0700, you wrote:
>I want to remind all the participants on the list that personal attacks
>and flaming serve no purpose here, especially when the subject did not
>originally arise on the list.
37 matches
Mail list logo