Yeah-- the same ACLU "civil libertarians" that defended the 'rights' of
Nazis
to march thru a Jewish neighborhhod in Skokie, Ill. and secretly gave
privileged info on their clients to the FBI during the '50s purges 'of
lefts-radicals
from public life.
The same ACLU that laughed at me solicit
Barkely Rosser has written here before about Krugman's habit of taking
other people's ideas without attribution.
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The quoted someone from the ACLU.
>
> On Fri, 4 Aug 100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > NPR reports that civil libertarians give the Philly cops
> > high marks.
>
> Which "civil libertarians" ?
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Joseph Noonan
> Houston, TX
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Michae
RE
>Paul Krugman has made original and very important
>contributions to the new trade theory,...
Krugman merely contributed to the construction of
_mathematical models_ for what has long been known by non-mainstream
economists, historicans, industrial policy advocates, and policy-makers
in v
On Fri, 4 Aug 100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> NPR reports that civil libertarians give the Philly cops
> high marks.
Which "civil libertarians" ?
--
Joseph Noonan
Houston, TX
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brad DeLong wrote:
> >Critics of Paul Krugman call him acerbic and boastful, unfair on the
>attack and unwilling to make concessions on thedefense, certain that he is
>correct, and always sure that thosewho disagree are mendacious or foolish
>(or both). And I cannot deny that these criticisms ar
NPR reports that civil libertarians give the Philly cops high marks.
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brad was comparing Krugman and Keynes. I was agreeing with him about the
similarities.
>
> At 02:10 PM 8/4/00 -0700, you wrote:
> >Brad is not altogether wrong. Both are clever, get access to the media,
> >try to be
> >provocative without being radical.
>
> both Krugman and Keynes -- or both
I cannot find the reference right now. I wrote to Leeson asking for another
copy. I recall that it had to do with his willingness to do anything to "win,"
regardless of how he stretched the truth.
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-89
At 02:10 PM 8/4/00 -0700, you wrote:
>Brad is not altogether wrong. Both are clever, get access to the media,
>try to be
>provocative without being radical.
both Krugman and Keynes -- or both Krugman and deLong?
Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
Brad is not altogether wrong. Both are clever, get access to the media, try to be
provocative without being radical.
Eugene Coyle wrote:
> Well, that tells us about both of them. Pathetic.
>
> Gene Coyle
>
> Jim Devine wrote:
>
> > Since we haven't heard from Brad deLong on pen-l in a long tim
>CB: Probably the reason I noticed it is that I AM ghetto. I speak
>middle-class for non-ghettoers. I'm bi-social.
this reminds me very little of the time that radio personality Michael
Feldman was interviewing NPR news-reader Scott Simon, who admitted to
liking both the Chicago White Sox an
I took my introductory grad course from Jorgenson. He prided himself on
writing down equations then erasing them before slow writers like myself
could copy down anything. He was the most smug teacher I ever
encountered.
Oh, speaking of error, how much did Feldstein's famous social security
erro
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/04/00 04:29PM >>>
At 04:21 PM 8/4/00 -0400, you wrote:
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/04/00 01:43PM >>>
>
>
>(I know that the MF always uses biased econometric techniques, but is there
>more?)
>
>*
>
>CB: "the MF"... Ghetto Jim D. double entendre ?
I've been u
At 04:21 PM 8/4/00 -0400, you wrote:
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/04/00 01:43PM >>>
>
>
>(I know that the MF always uses biased econometric techniques, but is there
>more?)
>
>*
>
>CB: "the MF"... Ghetto Jim D. double entendre ?
I've been using that double entendre for years on pen-l
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/04/00 01:43PM >>>
(I know that the MF always uses biased econometric techniques, but is there
more?)
*
CB: "the MF"... Ghetto Jim D. double entendre ?
what do you think of Krugman as the CEA chair under President Gore, with
Brad on board?
---
I see Feldstein redux; somebody (PK, not BDL) with no
political smarts who pisses everyone off, and who thinks
it's all about him, instead of the Administration he is
supposed to serve. I
I doubt it. At this stage the campaigns are not
into policy-think. They're too busy looking for
rocks to throw at each other. Whoever wins will
start soliciting policy books from aspiring
office-seekers.
mbs
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Beha
At 11:43 AM 8/4/00 -0700, you wrote:
>Is Brad deep undercover working for the Gore campaign on one of those
>thick-slick policy tomes that float in DC bookstores between now and Jan.?
what do you think of Krugman as the CEA chair under President Gore, with
Brad on board?
BTW, Max, last time I t
>Critics of Paul Krugman call him acerbic and boastful, unfair on the
attack and unwilling to make concessions on thedefense, certain that he is
correct, and always sure that thosewho disagree are mendacious or foolish
(or both). And I cannot deny that these criticisms are accurate. But all
t
Is Brad deep undercover working for the Gore campaign on one of those
thick-slick policy tomes that float in DC bookstores between now and Jan.?
>
>
> Since we haven't heard from Brad deLong on pen-l in a long time, here's a
> snippet from his web-site
> (http://www.j-bradford-delong.net/Econ_Ar
Well, that tells us about both of them. Pathetic.
Gene Coyle
Jim Devine wrote:
> Since we haven't heard from Brad deLong on pen-l in a long time, here's a
> snippet from his web-site
> (http://www.j-bradford-delong.net/Econ_Articles/Reviews/krugman_accidental.h
> tml):
>
> >Critics of Paul Kr
Hey, if biased econometric techniques resulted in name calling, there would be
a long list of names. Dale Jorgenson comes to mind.
Jim Devine wrote:
> At 10:28 AM 8/4/00 -0700, you wrote:
>
> >They said crook, because of his unscrupulous methods. Robert Leeson writes
> >about this.
>
> hey, pe
Since we haven't heard from Brad deLong on pen-l in a long time, here's a
snippet from his web-site
(http://www.j-bradford-delong.net/Econ_Articles/Reviews/krugman_accidental.h
tml):
>Critics of Paul Krugman call him acerbic and boastful, unfair on the
attack and unwilling to make concession
At 10:28 AM 8/4/00 -0700, you wrote:
>They said crook, because of his unscrupulous methods. Robert Leeson writes
>about this.
hey, pen-l wants to hear the dirt!
(I know that the MF always uses biased econometric techniques, but is there
more?)
Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & http://bellarmin
>Carroll, you will persist in misunderstanding. There are errors and
>errors. I think that many people are wrong about many things--you,
>often, Charles, often, Yoshie, frequently. Among us, that just
>indicates disagreement. i think Hayek was wrong about private
>property, but I don't think h
They said crook, because of his unscrupulous methods. Robert Leeson writes
about this.
Max Sawicky wrote:
> I have just opened up Sen's book, Development as Freedom. He proposes one
> type of freedom, where people are given the opportunity through education, a
> good environment . Milton
At 09:55 AM 8/4/00 -0700, you wrote:
>I have just opened up Sen's book, Development as Freedom. He proposes one
>type of freedom, where people are given the opportunity through education,
>a good environment . Milton Friedman proposes another type of freedom.
this seems to correspond to t
I have just opened up Sen's book, Development as Freedom. He proposes one
type of freedom, where people are given the opportunity through education, a
good environment . Milton Friedman proposes another type of freedom.
I disagree with Friedman, but I don't think that he makes an error.
Ins
I have just opened up Sen's book, Development as Freedom. He proposes one
type of freedom, where people are given the opportunity through education, a
good environment . Milton Friedman proposes another type of freedom.
I disagree with Friedman, but I don't think that he makes an error. In
Carroll, you will persist in misunderstanding. There are errors and errors. I think
that many people are wrong about many things--you, often, Charles, often, Yoshie,
frequently. Among us, that just indicates disagreement. i think Hayek was wrong about
private property, but I don't think he was
Yoshie Furuhashi wrote:
>
> _If_ our critics are indeed right about something, yes, we should
> revise our views; if not, no. Let's use Hayek as an example, since
> we had threads on him recently. As our disagreements over Hayek have
> shown, it is _not_ that Marxist critics of Hayek think th
Yoshie wrote:
>When I went to college, in contrast, teachers in economics spent much time
>criticizing Keynesians from one neoclassical point of view or
>another. They said Keynesians couldn't come up with a viable solution to
>stagflation, which destroyed the authority of Keynes.
hi, Yoshie.
Justin wrote:
>When our critics are right about something, we should revise our
>views. Unlike Yoshie, I don't think we should just listen to
>formulate better replies to their errors, but also to see if we can
>learn something, to correct our own errors. It is not an a priori
>truth that "we
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/04/00 11:06AM >>>
In a message dated Fri, 4 Aug 2000 10:51:23 AM Eastern Daylight Time, "Charles Brown"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
<< Lawyers are less centralized on a world level ( international law is still openly
"might makes right").
In fact, but not officially
Michael Perelman wrote:
>Japan grew very fast in the postwar period because its previous economists
>were mostly excluded because of their fascist past, leading to a void that
>Marxist trained economists filled. Eventually, Japan started hiring mostly
>orthodox economists and their economy slowe
In a message dated Fri, 4 Aug 2000 10:51:23 AM Eastern Daylight Time, "Charles Brown"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
<< Lawyers are less centralized on a world level ( international law is still openly
"might makes right").
In fact, but not officially. As a matter of law, the UN Charter is part
Yes, he did. He talks about how scientists (natural philosophers, as they said then)
struggled with the idea that work with your hands, necessary to set up experiments,
was not respectable for gentlemen, but the testimony of rude mechanics was not
credible. --jks
In a message dated Fri, 4 Aug
I take the liberty of supplying a "happy ending":
>They all climbed into the car, which was no easy task, even for a car as
>large as the limo. Once underway, one of the poor fellows says, "Sir, you
>are too kind. Thank you for taking all of us with you." The businessman
>replied, "No problem, th
Brian Czech wrote,
>The "New Economy" is a red herring swimming up Shit
>Creek, and posterity will despise us if we follow it far enough.
Brian attributes the rationale for unlimited economic growth to
neoclassical economics and its notion of substitution. It seems to me that
this fixation on
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/03/00 10:40PM >>>
. . .
> I am with Jim on this one. My entire roralties from
writing academic and
> political articles amount to less than $100 in 20 years. I
would be happy if
> someone read and used the stuff. I did make several
hardcover copies of my
> dissertation (
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/03/00 11:17PM >>>
<< Jim D. wrote: "who is it that determines who a "real authority" is? Is
there
a World
Congress of Philosophers who makes this decision?" >>
A very interesting question. Steve Shapin has explored this question with
respexct to early modern scienc
Lawyers are less centralized on a world level ( international law is still openly
"might makes right"). There is a lot of centralization on the national level with the
Supreme Courts and the like, but even there , money rules. There is some autonomy at
the trial court level, though again within
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/03/00 07:18PM >>>
Jim D. wrote: "who is it that determines who a "real authority" is? Is there
a World
Congress of Philosophers who makes this decision?"
=
Roger Coase floated the idea that there should be a few years back...very
scary.
_
CB: Whose that
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/03/00 04:14PM >>>
Charles Brown wrote:
>It is an a posteriori truth that we are correct about more things
>than our critics are.
Why aren't there more of "us" then?
___
The ruling class murders and ruins the upholders of these truths, so most don't join
us
One afternoon, a wealthy employer was riding in the back of his limousine
when he saw two men eating grass by the road side. He ordered his driver to
stop and he got out to investigate.
"Why are you eating grass?" he asked one man.
"We don't have any money for food," the poor man replied.
"Oh,
This is not restricted to economics. In the biological sciences, "science,"
has been redefined as meaning molecular biology (i.e., developing drugs and
other agents for pharmaceutical and agribusiness companies). Field
biologists and system's ecologists are not hired and those that remain are
deni
My thesis was 425 pages and it goes for the same price. A bargain!
-Original Message-
From: Doug Henwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2000 8:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PEN-L:239] Re: Re: Re: Re: contentville
Max Sawicky wrote:
>Bastids. selling my
This seems like the right time to introduce my new book, Shoveling Fuel
For A Runaway Train: Errant Economists, Shameful Spenders, and a Plan to
Stop Them All. The "New Economy" is a red herring swimming up Shit
Creek, and posterity will despise us if we follow it far enough. I do
not oppose inn
49 matches
Mail list logo
