Major compromise on London Tube

2001-02-03 Thread Chris Burford
The Independent (UK) reports what is seen as a major victory by Ken Livingstone over New Labour: he looks as if he has got to keep an integrated London Tube system, by bringing in a New Yorker. But he may not have got the right to raise bonds. Financing the development is still vague. Chris

de Soto

2001-02-03 Thread Jim Devine
Though I haven't read his book, I've thinking about Hernan de Soto (or whatever his name is exactly). His proposal, as I understand it, is to create property rights for the poor (using publicly-owned lands?), which he sees as a way to promote the development of capitalism (which he presumes

The Internet Anti-Fascist: Friday, 2 Feb 2001 -- 5:7 (#509)

2001-02-03 Thread Paul Kneisel
/=-=-=-=-Click Here Support Our Sponsor-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=\ Add "character" to your messages with eWalla! Use animations to deliver your personal messages! eWalla lets you send talking, animated cyber-characters to any PC desktop. It’s free so visit:

Canada-Brazil subsidy war

2001-02-03 Thread Bill Burgess
Brazil's jet dogfight By MARK MACKINNON From Saturday's Globe and Mail Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil — A sleek collection of factories and office towers set against a

California leads the way

2001-02-03 Thread Michael Perelman
Michael Hoover passed this on to me. Published Thursday, February 1, 2001, in the Miami Herald Open electric market needed Competition would help, panel says BY LESLEY CLARK [EMAIL PROTECTED] TALLAHASSEE -- Florida's electricity market should be opened to out-of-state companies

Re: de Soto

2001-02-03 Thread Michael Perelman
On Doug's show he never mentioned land reform or even the use of publicly owned lands. Instead, he seems to mean regulations that make it difficult to get credit for that restrict the ability to get business licenses. Jim Devine wrote: Though I haven't read his book, I've thinking about

Re: RE: The Economic Policy World Turned Topsy-Turvy

2001-02-03 Thread phillp2
Max (et at) The whole purpose of the Swedish investment funds was that worker profits would go to buy corporate shares that would ultimately lead to -- ulp! -- worker ownership. This was sufficiently upsetting to lead to a corporate (class) uprising to squelch any and all moves to

Marx's turnover cycle

2001-02-03 Thread Jim Devine
it seems to me that Marx's vision and that of Engels (see below) aren't totally in conflict and can be reconciled. Engels seems to see the problem totally in microeconomic and technological terms. Marx, on the other hand, sees depreciation as arising not only from technological factors but

Re: Marx's turnover cycle

2001-02-03 Thread Michael Perelman
Engels was concerned about the realism of bunching. Capital, he insisted, is discarded because of market obsolescence, not age. Also, different capitals have different expected lifetimes. You could get a bunching of new investment -- capital widening -- but not replacement investment, as Marx

Re: de Soto

2001-02-03 Thread Margaret Coleman
I haven't read De Soto's work, but from what has been described on pen-l, it sounds very much like several land distribution proposals which were popular in the USA during the 19th century. There was one large movement, pre-Marx, which also called for the abolishment of land ownership all

Re: Re: de Soto

2001-02-03 Thread Jim Devine
Maggie wrote: I haven't read De Soto's work, but from what has been described on pen-l, it sounds very much like several land distribution proposals which were popular in the USA during the 19th century. There was one large movement, pre-Marx, which also called for the abolishment of land

RE: Hernando de Soto

2001-02-03 Thread David Shemano
In response to Jim Devine: I haven't read his book either and can go only on the reviews I have read. I think you are misinterpreting him. To be pithy, his point is not that the poor in the Third World should be given property rights in public lands, but that they should be given property

Re: RE: Hernando de Soto

2001-02-03 Thread Michael Perelman
David's reading squares with mine. On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 08:44:17PM -0800, David Shemano wrote: In response to Jim Devine: I haven't read his book either and can go only on the reviews I have read. I think you are misinterpreting him. To be pithy, his point is not that the poor in the

RE: The Economic Policy World Turned Topsy-Turvy

2001-02-03 Thread Brad DeLong
Given the mainstream view of Social Security projections and your endorsement of AG, bursting chest and all, how is the Gov supposed to pre-fund Soc Sec against the period when the Fund runs a deficit? If I believed that labor force growth was going to slow to zero and labor productivity

More on Star Wars as corporate racketeering

2001-02-03 Thread Lisa Ian Murray
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/04/world/04EURO.html?pagewanted=all February 4, 2001 U.S. Tries Defusing Allies' Opposition to Missile Defense By MICHAEL R. GORDON MUNICH, Feb. 3 — Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, the first senior Bush administration official to visit Europe, tried today