history and I don't particularly
think I can contribute anything new and important to it at this point.
Thanks for the discussion.
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 4 Nov 1996, Blair Sandler wrote:
Merhaba Fikret, is it possible to know how you think Nader will change
the present system of the financial oligarchy which effectively
marginalizes
and ghettoizes the broad masses of the people? Or is this not his aim?
Shawgi Tell
Shawgi: you
What I meant was that Social
Text Co. were caught with their pants down and have had a lot of
explaining to do.
Certainly no question about that in my mind! What if anything it says about
post-modern wars is another question entirely.
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 12:01 AM 11/5/96, Blair Sandler wrote:
What I meant was that Social
Text Co. were caught with their pants down and have had a lot of
explaining to do.
Certainly no question about that in my mind! What if anything it says about
post-modern wars is another question entirely.
One thing
academics is not appreciated.
Of course, if I'm being overly sensitive and in fact your hopes expressed
below are sincere, than I thank you for your good wishes. I would indeed
appreciate a reasonable full time paid job that would enable me to get out
of debt.
Sincerely,
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
further. Case in point, his great articles in LBO 71 and 72
criticizing David Korten's book, WHEN CORPORATIONS RULE THE WORLD, and the
International Forum on Globalization. Those articles really helped
crystallize my own thinking already in formation.
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ell as
anything else, I think, the powerful *predictive* ability of Marxian theory.
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 7:44 AM 11/4/96, Blair Sandler wrote:
Doug Henwood, for example, has a way of producing information that often
leads me to new understandings, or at least assists me in developing my
understandings further. Case in point, his great articles in LBO 71 and 72
criticizing David Korten's book
will change anything,
since he's not going to be elected. And if he were, everything would be
different and so who could say what might change in that event?!
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
created conditions for
communist class processes, in which LTV would be transcended. [I'm being
simplistic and sloppy here but the general idea should be clear.]
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
life, I am unlikely to
respond.
Pete Bohmer
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ople might view differently.
I certainly can't say this about myself.
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
of my own perspectives on pomo (those
three books), but keep wanting to respond to specific things that come up
and I'm already stealing time from other deadline things I need to do.
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
of
accessible, political theory based on pomoish insights?
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
a commodity are three to four
times the market value?
[I would really like to know the source of these estimates and am pissed
that they aren't cited. What I tell my students is that even if the
estimates are too big by three to four times, then they're still the
equivalent of the market cost and the same question is appropriate.]
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
deadlines). Sheesh!
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, the strings lack of elasticity when talking about basic
Neoclassical economics, the remaining strings are assumed to be stiff.
My interpretation is, that here with the spider net is the initial
connection and simultaneously starts the divergence.
What do you think about that?
Blair Sandler
On Mon, 28 Oct 1996, Blair Sandler wrote:
I hate to say it but UMass Amherst is the obvious place to go, with Rick
Wolff, Steve Resnick, Sam Bowles, Nancy Folbre (and Ann Ferguson down the
hall), Julie Graham in geography, David Kotz, Jim Crotty, Jim Boyce, even
(shudder) Herb Gintis
tainable development.
I have to go now but I'm going to send this out now as a teaser. I'll be
back later this weekend with more about my take on post-modernism and
what's valuable about these three books.
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 8:39 AM 11/1/96, Blair Sandler wrote:
And DEVELOPMENT BETRAYED is a book-length critique of modernism (NC theory
comes in for repeated attacks on just that basis) in the form of
development theory and practice, and a post-modern analysis of the need for
and possibilty of sustainable
her
argument, which is nonetheless fundamentally post-modern. (THE COMING
PLAGUE).
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
es is part of a
service sold as a commodity by the dental corporation.
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
strated my understanding of the course material and more,
and when he wouldn't raise my grade, requested another opportunity to take
a test. Nope. The only F I got at Yale. I wasn't an econ major at that
point; I'm not quite sure why that didn't stop me from switching my major
to economics later.
Blair
ry, it seems to me to indicate the necessity of *greater*
collective political action, specifically of communal or communist class
processes, wherein workers collectively appropriate their own surplus labor
and decide what to do with it (and thus how to organize their work, etc.).
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
of these
individuals or their work, UMass offers a broad range of different
heterodox perspectives on social theory.
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
st defense cutbacks, because there aren't any!
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
the nerve to argue that the Internet was the proof that government can't
pick research and should stay out of the way and let private capital decide
what to do. It even acknowledged (in one sentence) that the Pentagon
started the Internet. Sheesh!
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AL, Marx was arguing not *for* but *against* the
Ricardian notion that the rate of capital falls.
Of course in the last sentence I meant that the rate of *profit* falls, not
the rate of *capital*. Sorry for the typo. It was 5:00 AM when I wrote that.
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
arguing not *for* but *against* the
Ricardian notion that the rate of capital falls. Also, see Steve
Cullenberg's book, THE FALLING RATE OF PROFIT: RECASTING THE MARXIAN
DEBATE, Pluto Press, 1994.
Regards,
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
this
point very explicitly in his book.
Yes, but it should be obvious that in interpreting debates on a subject
one's own interpretation on the subject is revealed as well. And I know
Steve would agree with this.
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
but
irrelevant to the question I posed about concessions, rhetoric and saving
face.
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
hese posts
or a summary with anyone else who requested it of me.
Thanks in advance.
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
used the subject header "teaching reform and revolution?"
Appreciating all the replies so far; keep 'em coming, folks!
Thanks.
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Someone mentioned that Eudora can filter out mail, though perhaps the
shareware version I use is not up to this task.
Sandy, I believe this is the case, though as I don't use the shareware
version I'm not sure.
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ing those tendencies in those who are or will be in business; or
do you teach that unions can increase productivity; "environmentally
friendly commodities" can be profitable, and the like, thereby reinforcing
liberal tendencies at the cost of pushing "socialism" away?
Eagerly a
uld like institutionally is
underdeveloped but far from nonexistent.
On this point, again, I suggest you look at CNS. Lots of great articles
about political economy and political ecology (where in my mind politics is
about power).
Regards,
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
program of art and cultural
activities. The full schedule of art, panels and plenaries, along with
information about registration, travel instructions, accomodations,
daycare, and publishers' exhibitions is available on the web site.
Hope to see you there!
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ns from corporations regarding long term job security for workers,
or are these various promises on the part of the corporations little more
than rhetorical dressing so the unions can save face?
On the other hand, CAW workers got health and some other benefits for
same-sex partners.
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"read"; then transfer to trash. This avoids a dialog box if you
manually empty Eudora's trash.)
On a Mac, if you're not using Eudora, it's pretty easy to write an
AppleScript (or QuicKeys macro) to do the same thing.
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ed on Earth: extremists,
communists, vandals, saboteurs, reds, terrorists. Never the words *rebel*
or *revolutionary*, words of which half the Earth (at least) might approve.
No, they were isolated groups of insane, destructive terrorists."
Okay, that's all. I'm interested in comments from others who have (or
haven't) read this work.
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robert Naiman writes,
"we're tired, we're cranky, we don't like the government"
How about,
"we're sick, the earth is sick, we're pissed, we hate big business"
??
:)
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
o the West as to the East of England. So
"Middle East" is completely unhelpful in terms of locating anything. It has
come to be accepted as a name only because of the history of English (and
now U.S.) imperialism. Can't we give this one up?
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
de the Persian Gulf
countries as they do not border the Mediterranean. Even Jordan would
technically be excluded. Perhaps "Greater Levant" is intended to solve this
problem.
I actually *like* "Afro-Asia." "Western Asia," of course, does not include
Egypt, so that's a problem with *that* name.
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
reless. My apologies. It should be obvious that my
question/criticism refers equally to the "Far East" or "the Orient."
Actually, from the point of view of England, I'd think that Ireland is the
Far East.
And for the U.S. the Far East would be California. Hey, that's me! :)
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
d I hear
someone say bye-bye community?).
It seems that the only circumstance in which the job guarantee will take
effect is if a company wants to produce fewer cars because it loses market
share.
Perhaps I'm missing something, but what exactly did the UAW gain with this
contract?
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
o question management.
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
;
*
Under NAFTA, governments have obligations to investors, but not to
environment or public health.
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
y courses, and most of the class and extra-curricular discussions with
professors and students, were extremely valuable. I do not regret for a
moment having obtained my Ph.D. from there.
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
about what a sleezy slimy slug he
is.
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Antonio wrote,
I hope I am not irking any Hegelians out there
Oh come now, Antonio: you *like* irking Hegelians! :)
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm listening to a very cool CD of Thelonious Monk (advanced jazz?) as I
write this. But he's African American, so it's okay, right?
Blair (who is NOT on the same wavelength as Clinton) Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oh shit, I better turn in my union card, I listen to classical music
(rgh)
slimy slug
he is.
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
he effectivity of a "thing" is just what the
thing is. Since things are all different, so is their effectivity, and thus
it doesn't make sense to say they are "equally" effective (important). For
a concrete argument of this point, see THE ECOLOGIST 26/3, May/June 1996,
pp. 98-103, for John O'Neill's short but excellent critique of cost-benefit
analysis on just these lines.
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ignificant? Is this old territory, written about and discussed ad nauseum
already?
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is a response to Jim Devine's message, copied below.
I frankly did not understood what Steve meant by his off-the-cuff,
tongue-in-cheek (?) comment about "what you see is what you get." I didn't
think it helped explain anything, and I don't think your snide (so it seems
to me) response
enter and is based in the Thoreau
Center for Sustainability in the Presidio of San Francisco.
-30-
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Obviously in the
mainstream press North Korea is described as near-Gulag, not to mention
desperately poor, etc. Could you say briefly what you see as "the best" of
the North?
Thanks in advance.
In ignorance,
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
organization considerable time and
money to produce it. We would like to continue to provide this
service free. You could help by making a tax-deductible
contribution (anything you can afford, whether $5.00 or
$500.00). Please send your contribution to: Environmental
Research Foundation, P.O. Box 5036, Annapolis, MD 21403-7036.
--Peter Montague, Editor
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-3137 fax
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http://www.panix.com/~dhenwood/LBO_home.html
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
The obvious conclusions are that welfare benefits were
astonishingly high to begin with, and that the recipients
are slow learners.
Peter
You, Sir, have a dry and acerbic sense of humor I rather like. :)
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
interested in such information. Please copy any
email notes to me. Thanks.
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
er
603 374 9263 (ph)
603 374 6509 (fax) Assoc. Prof./Economics Women's Studies
GENERAL DELIVERYUniversity of Southern Maine
Bartlett, NH 03812Portland, Me 04103
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tremendously
over the past 10 or more years and particularly so in the last half of that
period.
Regards,
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ecause it's not how I remember
you). If you're genuinely interested, look at the literature of the Amherst
School over the past 4 years to see a significant number of people thinking
creatively about socialism. (And if I've misread your tone, my apologies.)
Sincerely,
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
been going on for 15 years already and still going strong,
no?). Perhaps sometime we can get into it and give it the attention it
deserves (maybe you could do that now but I can't).
Blair
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
long involved discussions on this matter. I'm broke, unemployed,
job-searching, paper-writing, and leaving in a week on a trip for a week.
Sorry, Eric.
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
vement of human potential and on other
rhelms of society. Otherwise, why care about a transformation to
socialism?
Eric
.
Eric Nilsson
Department of Economics
California State University
San Bernardino, CA 92407
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ce to the "errors" of BG.
Eric
.
Eric Nilsson
Department of Economics
California State University
San Bernardino, CA 92407
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rich Parkin,
Economics Dept.,
400 Wickenden Building,
10,900 Euclid Ave.,
Case Western Reserve University,
Cleveland, OH 44106-7206
(216) 368-4294 (w)
(216) 368-5039 (fax)
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
people in the Amherst School) reject any
effort "to say anything about the real world." Anyone who could think so
has clearly not read or understood the work coming out of the Amherst
School over the past bunch of years.
Of course, I'm just an "airheaded pomo," so what would I
Gene: this is precisely my critique of the enviro justice movement: it is
trying to make good citizens of corporations: viz: "good neighbor"
agreements. See the reasoning in DYING FROM DIOXIN, e.g.
Blair
At 9:41 PM 7/23/96, Eugene P. Coyle wrote:
Forwarded mail received from:
At 6:24 AM 7/23/96, Doug Henwood wrote:
At 7:12 PM 7/22/96, Blair Sandler wrote:
I don't know whether ecological economists agree, but I wonder what it
would mean to say such a thing. Usually "goods" are things that humans
produce, in which case what is the point of calling it "n
At 10:31 AM 7/23/96, Gil Skillman wrote:
In response to this passage from Doug,
Is it pretty universally agreed by ecological economists that nature is a
public good, or is that at all controversial?
Blair writes:
I don't know whether ecological economists agree, but I wonder what it
would
I guess I'm just in a disagreeable mood today, at least where Jim Devine is
concerned. :)
It's *not* a clear case of waste, if the people are occupying resources
(land, housing, educational facilities, etc.) that could be put to better
use by a people who are less lazy and shiftless, less
The problem with Jim's analysis below, as I see it, is that efficiency *is*
in the eye of the beholder, or that dynamic efficiency is impossible to pin
down. Unemployed resources can be *efficient* if they spur the economy onto
greater growth and thus everyone always enjoys a higher standard of
At 4:17 PM 7/23/96, Doug Henwood wrote:
At 2:05 PM 7/23/96, Blair Sandler wrote:
Absolutely right, but this kind of "production" doesn't seem to have much
to do with the "production of goods" -- or anyway, that's my question. What
is gained and what is lost by referring to
At 11:52 AM 7/22/96, Doug Henwood wrote:
Is it pretty universally agreed by ecological economists that nature is a
public good, or is that at all controversial?
Doug
I don't know whether ecological economists agree, but I wonder what it
would mean to say such a thing. Usually "goods" are things
or someone like Newt who has metaphorically
raped a substantial portion of the domestic population?
;-)
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 5:55 PM 7/17/96, James Michael Craven wrote:
Date sent: Wed, 17 Jul 1996 17:34:41 -0700 (PDT)
Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Blair Sandler)
To: Multiple recipients of list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:[PEN-L:5211] Re: Bumper
Well, now everyone knows I hate neoclassical theory. That's what I get for
"replying" to a personal message mistakenly sent to the list. ;-)
At 6:24 PM 7/18/96, Blair Sandler wrote:
There are
fundamentally two diametrically opposed attitudes to NC theory and also to
capit
Rethinking MARXISM announces an International Conference
POLITICS AND LANGUAGES OF CONTEMPORARY MARXISM
December 5--8 (Thursday--Sunday), 1996
University of Massachusetts at Amherst
Call for Papers and Session Proposals
Join with Jack Amariglio, Etienne Balibar, John Beverly, Tim
k and risk taking that makes the
economic pie grow and makes everyone better off. Without inequality there
is no incentive for economic growth and everyone is worse off.
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
y in
college economics classes.
In struggle,
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If the germ theory of communism is true then I would be the virus.
At 6:50 AM 7/12/96, GC-Etchison, Michael wrote:
Blair Sandler rightly complains 7/11 that when I wrote that
libertarians might riposte that the Left says "I've got your, fuck you,"
I was ahead of the times. I'm probably the only one on the list, I
guess, that takes the possibili
" it would make at least *some*
sense, but as written is completely absurd, especially in light of people's
comments about the institutional and official support that e.g. Becker gets
while lefty analyses rot in dissertation microfilm archives.
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 9:59 PM 7/9/96, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tavis asks; "Written by runaway computers or space aliens?"
I vote for the aliens. maggie
Alien computers. -- Blair
At 9:49 PM 7/9/96, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Barkley Rosser notes, correctly, that there is no way to measure efficiency
outside the nc framework. I would take this a couple of steps further:
1. The nc frame work does not measure efficiency. It measures a trade off
between a couple of points
Doug: one of the funniest posts I've seen on PEN-L for a long time. Thanks!
Blair
At 8:16 AM 7/10/96, Doug Henwood wrote:
From today's Labor Economics abstracts:
"The L.A. Riot and the Economics of Urban Unrest"
BY: DENISE DIPASQUALE
University of Chicago
At 9:27 AM 7/10/96, Doug Henwood wrote:
At 8:57 AM 7/10/96, Terrence Mc Donough wrote:
Does this boil down to arguing that Blacks and Hispanics have too
much time on their hands?
That's sorta what it sounds like, eh? And that idle hands are the devil's
playthings especially when the idle
Etchison
[opinions mine, not the PUCT's]
Gary Becker is not a person. He's a utility-maximizing organism. Two
entirely unrelated species.
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 9:54 PM 7/1/96, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For all those digit heads out there. fondly (heh, heh, heh) maggie coleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Forwarded message:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 96-07-01 17:21:27 EDT
To
hat.
Well, it goes without saying that anyone who supports neoclassical theory,
even "generally," is irrational.
;-)
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
understand why it is so, but these circumstances are
completely destructive of relations of solidarity and community.
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 12:38 PM 7/1/96, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay. I'll answer Max's question. If I had kids (I do) would I want to
know if the guy down the street
http://www.whitehouse.gov/WH/html/briefroom.html#fsbr
This is the newly centralized web address for federal economic and social
statistics, with links to BLS etc.
Everything from the GDP to the national mortality rate at your fingertips.
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 8:59 AM 5/15/96, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Come ON guys, you don't expect someone in Samuelson's position to deal with
REALITY do you? maggie coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maggie: I would say, "you don't expect someone with Samuelson's politics to
deal with REALITY do you?"
Blair
that their conditions improve not
a whit as wage slaves to the British companies. *Great* movie.
On my soapbox again
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
s,
largely adapted to the need to accommodate the entrance of women and people
of color into their workforce.
??
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on pen-l should know the answer.
I guess warped minds think alike: I have wondered about that since the late
70s when I was introduced to the drink. I suppose the question would be
answered by knowing where and when the drink was invented/named.
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Today is the 178th anniversary of the birth of Karl Marx. Marx was no saint
but he believed in the ability and the right of working people to manage
their own affairs, and he opposed the rampant theft we call capitalist
profit.
Happy birthday, everyone.
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Doug, thanks for the Enzensberger piece.
Blair
1 - 100 of 247 matches
Mail list logo