Training dogs to be better bone gatherers and increasing the supply of bones are not mutually exclusive. -----Original Message----- From: Mathew Forstater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wednesday, September 01, 1999 12:06 PM Subject: [PEN-L:10534] Re: Re: Re: Re: Bonelessness... >Look, the metaphor is not *against* education and training. Can't you see >the difference between something being *wrong* and something being >*incomplete*? Mat > >-----Original Message----- >From: Brad De Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Wednesday, September 01, 1999 11:55 AM >Subject: [PEN-L:10533] Re: Re: Re: Bonelessness... > > >>>First of all, if you read my post, I in no way said training and education >>>programs are a "scam", nor did I say that Phil Harvey said so. What I >said >>>was that any policy program to reduce joblessness that did not address the >>>issue of job creation was insufficient. It does not mean that I am >against >>>education or training. >> >>But the metaphor is against education and training... >> >>*Think* about the implications of the metaphors you use. That's what >>Dierdre McCloskey says. I think it's good advice. >> >>Brad DeLong >> >
