Ricardo Duchesne wrote: > Moore's *Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy* is as Marxist as > they come - unless you just want paraphrasing of Marx's work. His > whole analysis centers around the role of classes. That was my impression too. Moore really focuses in on social relations. His work on India, China and Japan is valuable because there is so little of it in english (as far as I'm aware.) Of course it is somewhat dated and open to interpretation. Didn't Moore co-author(co-edit?)a work with Marcuse and R.Paul Wolff *The Critique of Pure Tolerance*? Michael Hoover will know. Sam Pawlett
