Well, Tom, I always enjoy your posts. So I see that by "reproduction" you
were referring to strategic changes in the reproduction of total social
capital. I am wondering whether your analysis has been inspired by Tony
Negri's writings on the social factory, which I have myself not read. 
There is a very good discussion of the social impact of the acceleleration
in the turn-over of capital in Geoffrey Kay's marvelous introduction to
marxist economic theory *The Economic Theory of The Working Class*).  

By the way (and of course), surplus profits on the world market do not only
obtain from a competitive redistribution of surplus value to imperialist
capitals from semi-colonial ones; one imperialist capital can gain
"technological rents" from another.  And it is new forms of state support
of such profit that some   have taken to be the defining feature of the
state today, as the Keynesian apparatus withers away (e.g., the attempt to
bolster profits through inflation may fail if  cheaper foreign goods can be
easily imported due to advances in transportation and telecommunications). 
At least, something like this is part of Bob Jessop's characterization of
the shift from the Keynesian welfare state to the Schumpeterian workfare
state.

 I thought you were referring to new functions the state may play in the
regulation of the reproduction of labor power . Well, for my part, I do
think that reproduction, as a social problem,  is one of the strategic
sites of modern capitalism, and David Horn's book on *Social Bodies* is a
fascinating read.  Many of its insights and concepts can be applied to the
contemporary debate on the underclass for example-- also a group, like the
professoriat, outside the material labor process and traditional marxist
critique but very much the victim and object of state intervention, as
argued for example by Sanford Schram in *Words of Welfare* (Minnesota,
1995).  

Well, to think about the debate as Jerry has  outlined it, I am reading the
relevant chapters (esp. "A Taxonomy of Teacher Work")in Aronowitz and
DiFazio's *The Jobless Future*. (Minnesota, 1994).  Oh, oh, that's too many
books from the Univ of Minnesota Press for an economics conference.

rakesh

Reply via email to