Dear Penners:

I find Terry's historical approach VERY VALUABLE.  I use it too.  One final
suggestion -- if you can successfully squeeze in the THEORY of
macroeconomics into the first 10 weeks of the semester, I like the end with
three-four weeks of a LABORATORY story -- Using the last 20-25 years of US
economic history, I have the students read Bowles Gordon and Weisskopf's
_After the Wasteland_ which builds a "conflict" growth model and then
applies it to the period before and after the Reagan Revolution.  This
permits one to revisit a number of issues --- the limits of Keynesianism,
the "monetarist experiment" -- the "test" of R.E. with the so-called
"credibility hypothesis" surrounding the strong anti-inflationary policy of
the FED in 1979-82 which by all rights (following R.E.) would have resulting
in a big fall in the nominal rate of interest, but it didn't! -- and finally
the possibility that distribution of income and power relations have a lot
to do with rates of economic growth [the BGW model].  After a lot of theory
that students often find very unpleasant and hard going, the "lab" part of
the course is quite enjoyable for them -- despite the radical conclusions of
the authors. -- 
Mike Meeropol
Economics Department
Cultures Past and Present Program
Western New England College
Springfield, Massachusetts
"Don't blame us, we voted for George McGovern!"
Unrepentent Leftist!!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[if at bitnet node:  in%"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" but that's fading fast!]

Reply via email to