A short respose to Shawgi Tell on Canadian medicare.

1st, there are difficulties, primarily with reduction in funding
by the Federal government (though the provinces are not blameless
here).
2nd, there was a great need for reform in the system since it
discouraged _pre_ventative medicine in favour of crisis intervention
medicine and it encouraged high cost institutional care rather than
home care and other alternatives.
3rs, there is a real bias toward capital intensive hospital care in
our system  -- a bias that is expensive and, in medical terms,
inefficient.

The problem is that these probems can not be addressed easily at the
federal level which can only dictate the level of funding.  Furthermore,
the real escalation of costs has been in the cost of drugs that have
skyrocketed since Canada gave in to American pressure and extended
the patent protection to international drug companies such that the
cost of drugs now exceeds the cost of physician services in Canada.
In order to dealwith this problem, we will probably have to
cancel the Can-US free trade agreement.  This may be a necessary
precondition of providing affordable health care in Canada -- and
probably the US as well.

Nevertheless, Shawgi Tell's analysis is symplistic and does little
to help us save medicare in Canada.

On the line for health care,

Paul Phillips,
Economics,
University of Manitoba

Reply via email to