Doug, are you sure. Many studies suggest that BGH is dangerous; the same for apsertine. I don't think that those studies will budge the current concensus. What is new is that biology is now more than ever a commercial science that requires commercial funding -- moving it into the handmaiden camp. With physics, less commercial interests are involved. Doug Henwood wrote: > Natural science may be corrupt - a servant of power, money, and orthodoxy - > but I don't think you could sustain this kind of untruth for 30 years in > physics or biology, could you? -- Michael Perelman Economics Department California State University [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chico, CA 95929 530-898-5321 fax 530-898-5901
