------- Forwarded Message Follows -------
Date sent:              Mon, 14 Jun 1999 13:08:12 -0700
To:                     (Recipient list suppressed)
From:                   Sid Shniad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:                SECRET TALKS WITH MILOSEVIC SPLIT RUSSIAN LEADERSHIP -
        Financial Times

The National Post                                       June 14, 1999

SECRET TALKS WITH MILOSEVIC CAUSE SPLIT IN RUSSIAN LEADERSHIP

London — Russian officials,  in collaboration with key leaders in 
the European Union, opened a secret channel in May to Slobodan 
Milosevic, the Yugoslav president, which was instrumental in 
securing a peace deal in Kosovo, according to EU and Yugoslav 
officials.

However, the machinations in the runup to acceptance of the deal 
have opened up huge fissures in Russian leadership which now 
threaten the peacekeeping effort in Kosovo, and even the stability 
of the Russian government itself.

A source close to the leadership of the Serbian security services, 
who refused to be identified, said Peter Castenfelt, a Swedish-born 
financier acting as a secret envoy, had revealed to Mr. Milosevic, 
just days before Belgrade approved the Group of Eight peace plan 
on June 3, NATO's final terms for an agreement.

The source said it became clear to Mr. Milosevic that the deal was 
better than that offered by leading NATO powers during the 
Rambouillet negotiations earlier this year — especially since it gave 
the UN Security Council control of the operation in Kosovo.

"This means that the UN mandate can be voted down by the 
Russians and the Chinese when we don't want them [NATO] in 
[Kosovo] any more," said the Yugoslav source.

He said it was critically important to Yugoslavia to have Russian 
presence in the province, both to affirm Moscow's strategic interest 
in the region and to protect the Serbs.

His testimony, and that of German officials and advisors, suggest 
the talks with Mr. Milosevic, both open and covert, were more of a 
negotiation than leaders of the NATO countries have admitted.

One advisor said Mr. Castenfelt had been asked to stress in his ne-
gotiations that Mr. Milosevic's indictment as a war criminal was 
"completely separate" from a peace agreement. "We could not 
change or soften the judgment, but we could say that it was a quite 
different matter," the advisor said.

The Serb security official said the effect of the peace settlement 
would be to "completely change" the Russian political system, with 
the next president of Russia being committed to an anti-West 
stance.

He said Mr. Milosevic had had bad relations with Boris Yeltsin, the 
Russian president, always supporting and regularly entertaining Mr. 
Yeltsin's opponents in Belgrade.

Mr. Castenfelt, the undercover envoy used by the Russians and the 
EU, has a record of behind-the-scenes economic diplomacy on 
behalf of successive Russian governments for the past six years, 
particularly on deals with the International Monetary Fund.

Senior Russian officials loyal to Mr. Yeltsin had become concerned 
the talks between Mr. Milosevic and Viktor Chernomyrdin, the 
Russian envoy to the Balkans who was appointed in April by Mr. 
Yeltsin, were producing no results.

Mr. Chernomyrdin, the longest-serving prime minister under Mr. 
Yeltsin, was seen in Russia and the West as not up to the task of 
conveying either the West's or NATO's position to Mr. Milosevic.

Mr. Castenfelt was briefed in Moscow by government officials, and 
in Bonn by Wolfgang Ischinger, state secretary at the German 
foreign ministry; Michael Steiner, foreign policy advisor to Gerhard 
Schroeder, the chancellor; and Karl Kaiser, head of the Research 
Institute of the German Society of Foreign Affairs and Mr. 
Schroeder's foreign affairs advisor during last year's election 
campaign.

Mr. Castenfelt also met Martti Ahtisaari, the EU envoy to the 
Balkans and the Finnish president, and Arpo Rusi, his advisor. He 
then flew to Sofia, Bulgaria from where he was taken to the 
Yugoslav border under the protection of Russian special forces and 
passed over to Yugoslav security and taken to Belgrade.

In a one-to-one meeting with Mr. Milosevic, in meetings with 
ministers and officials and in a six-page analysis of the situation 
composed in a bunker during a NATO bombing raid, Mr. Castenfelt 
succeeded in defining the terms which could be represented as a 
compromise, not a capitulation.

The Serbian security source said that "he explained to us for the 
first time what the truth was. We had never heard it before."

The Serb source said the points on which the NATO deal was 
significantly better than the terms offered during the 
Rambouillet accords were particularly critical for their 
eventual acceptance by Mr. Milosevic in talks with Mr. 
Ahtisaari and Mr. Chernomyrdin.

These were, he said, that there would be no referendum in 
Kosovo after three years, as the Rambouillet accord specified: 
that there would be a UN presence, not merely NATO; that the 
Kosovo Liberation Army was not recognized, where it had 
been at Rambouillet; and that Russian troops were part of the 
Kosovo force, which had not been specified before.

Mr. Castenfelt had not, however, touched on the chain of command 
in the force in Kosovo — precisely the issue which is now in 
contention in the province as Russia continues to reject any 
subordination to NATO forces.

The Serb security source said that Russian military officers 
travelling with Mr. Chernomyrdin and Mr. Ahtisaari to Belgrade for 
the final peace talks had exploded in rage because of their 
marginalization, and because Mr. Chernomyrdin had agreed to 
Russian forces being subordinated to NATO.

Mr. Rusi said he could confirm he talked several times to Mr. 
Castenfelt on the issues, and "this was always kept separate from 
the main talks conducted by Mr. Ahtisaari. I hoped he would be 
able to convey information to Belgrade which would facilitate the 
agreement."

The Financial Times



Reply via email to