; slid over into a discussion of the more purely ecological
> side of things. But, all should keep in mind that the
> coevolving ecosystem includes the economy and the mutual
> interactions between the human (economic) and the non-human
> parts of the broader ecosystem. The relevance of
&
side of things. But, all should keep in mind that the
coevolving ecosystem includes the economy and the mutual
interactions between the human (economic) and the non-human
parts of the broader ecosystem. The relevance of
"exogenous shocks" (asteroids, etc.) versus "endogenous
s
I am happy to see the discussion about asteroids and the like. I have
just completed the first draft of a book ms. that is based on the
analogues of punctuated equilibrium and economic crises.
By the time that this thread dies down, I will have the book completed and
will settle all disputes
Robin writes:
>I thought this was a list for economists. Well, OK, not exactly
>economists but political economists. Is that what makes a political
>economist different from a mainstream economist. We talk about asteroids
>and dinosaurs?
I think one thing that distinguishes us fro
released sufficiently large amounts of carbon
into the atmosphere to cause climate change sufficient to kill them off
globally.
I thought this was a list for economists. Well, OK, not exactly
economists but political economists. Is that what makes a political
economist different from a mainstream economist. We talk about asteroids
and dinosaurs?
On Mon, 27 Apr 1998, Rosser Jr, John Barkley wrote concerning the
demise of the dinos:
> ...the current scientific
> consensus that they got zapped by an asteroid hit is really
> coming on strong. Among other major pieces of evidence has
> been the discovery of the remnants of the hit in the