An article by Andrew Goetz in The Journal of Transport Geography, March
2002 does a pretty convincing job on US airline deregulation. Among other
things, he notes that because of the economics of hub and spoke
routing/scheduing, one airline has come to more or less monopolize each
regional hub, cr
Anders Schneiderman wrote:
Speaking of which, anybody know of a good relatively recent article from a progressive perspective about how airline deregulation fared? I've seen a couple of moderates in the last few days who have said, hey deregulation isn't all that bad look at the airlines. My impr
Anders writes: >My impression is that in the airline industry, prices are down for
lucky people like myself who live in DC but not for people who live in my hometown,
Syracuse New York, and that travel biplane is a lot more painful than it used to be<
they've gone back to the old technology? ;-)
Speaking of which, anybody know of a good relatively recent article from a progressive
perspective about how airline deregulation fared? I've seen a couple of moderates in
the last few days who have said, hey deregulation isn't all that bad look at the
airlines. My impression is that in the ai
[They consistently phrase things in such a way as to flatter
deregulationists. But their bottom line argument seems to be that dereg
can only work with a government run grid -- in other words, if it is
considerably regged. Buried in here is a not bad illustration of how real
markets depend on gov
Yergin and Makovich don't make a lot of sense here, though it all sounds
statesman-like. I'd better try a letter to the Times. I debated
Makovich in Brazilia a couple of years ago. He told the congress that
they'd better speed privatization and also give investors lots of money
or the rationing
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Pollak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [They consistently phrase things in such a way as to flatter
> deregulationists. But their bottom line argument seems to be that dereg
> can only work with a government run grid -- in other words, if it is
> considerably
[They consistently phrase things in such a way as to flatter
deregulationists. But their bottom line argument seems to be that dereg
can only work with a government run grid -- in other words, if it is
considerably regged. Buried in here is a not bad illustration of how real
markets depend on gov
