> Hi Sid;
>
> The paper in question is called:
>
> "Going South: Cheap Labour as an Unfair Subsidy in North American Free
> Trade", by jim Stanford (Ottawa: Canadian Centre for POlicy Alternatives,
> 1991, 52 pp.
>
> I can send a copy to whoever is interested.
>
> All the best,
> JS
> Sid: If you haven't given this citation to Gulick yet, I recall that Jim
> Stanford had a very good paper on US low wages (etc) as an unfair trade
> practice, which is highly relevant to the theme Gulick wants to pursue.
> Stanford would also probably have more substantive materials on the
> sub
How to explain FDI in the US? Higher rates of exploitation? Supersized
market which more than compensates for relatively slower growth rates?
Circumvention of explicit and hidden protectionism: voluntary export
restraints, trigger price mechanisms and targeted trade practices--all
devious protecti
On Mon, October 27, 1997 at 16:58:54 (+) john gulick writes:
>As many learned observers on this list have noted, U.S. government
>officials in the last few years have come to tout gov't
>deregulation/labor flexibility as the reason why capitalism
>Anglo-American style has outperformed capitali
Pen-L'ers,
As many learned observers on this list have noted, U.S. government officials
in the last few years have come to tout gov't deregulation/labor flexibility
as the reason why capitalism Anglo-American style has outperformed capitalism
continental European style in recent years (performanc
