Friday, May 5 10:28 AM SGT

Little interest among Chinese students one year after NATO bombing

BEIJING, May 5 (AFP) -

For many students who took part in the violent anti-US protests after the 
NATO bombing of China's embassy in Belgrade anger has given way to study, 
job hunting and the dream of living abroad.

The atmosphere on the campus of Beijing's People's University during this 
week's MayDay holiday week was relaxed and students expressed little 
interest and almost no anger over the May 7, 1999 bombing.

"As far as I know there are no activities on our campus planned to 
commemorate the anniversary of the bombing," student He Beifang told AFP.

Students studying international affairs or foreign languages might have 
special discussion sessions, but few students were thinking about the 
bombing despite the tremendous anger they unleashed last year, he said.

"Of course we were very angry about it last year, but the US paid 
compensation to China and to the families of the victims, so right now I 
don't think many students are angry about it," said Wei, an English major.

"We still don't believe the US explanation that the bombing was a mistake, 
so it is still up to the US to give China a satisfactory explanation," she 
said.

In the aftermath of the bombing which killed three Chinese journalists, 
Chinese students erupted into four days of angry protests throughout China 
-- smashing windows at the US Embassy in Beijing and torching the US 
Consulate in Chengdu, Sichuan province.

Police largely declined to intervene as students rained stones, bottles and 
paint bombs on the US missions and chanted anti-American slogans.

Wei and He said they attended the huge demonstrations, but denied the 
protests only occured because the government allowed them to.

"Yes, the government and university leaders encouraged us to go down to 
protest at the US Embassy, but everyone was really angry so you can't say 
that it was only the government who organized the protests," Wei said.

The protests were the biggest in China since the six-week-long 1989 
Tiananmen democracy protests which were crushed by the Chinese military.

Other students said the granting of permanent normal trade relationsto 
China by the US Congress in a vote later this month, would go a long way 
towards showing that the United States was not trying to contain China, but 
was willing to work with China.

"PNTR will show that the US wants to work with China and stop using power 
politics to interfere in China's internal affairs," said a law student from 
Hebei University who was visiting the People's University.

"A lot of students were happy to see the statements by Vice President (Al) 
Gore that supported PNTR and improved relations between China and the US," 
he said.

In a foreign policy speech on Monday, Gore, the Democratic presidential 
nominee in this year's elections, called China a "vital partner" and 
pledged to build stronger relations.

His statements were widely reported in the Chinese press, as were 
statements made Tuesday by President Bill Clinton which said failure to 
pass PNTR would be "very unwise and precarious" from a national security 
point of view.

With China's probable entry into the World Trade Organisation, most 
students looked forward to better ties with the West and many shied away 
from discussing politics.

"Students here are only concerned about finding good jobs after college, so 
we concentrate on our studies and pay little attention to politics," one 
student said.

"I would think that every college student in China studies English and many 
are hoping to go abroad to study," he said. "Study in the US is still the 
first choice."

The US Central Intelligence Agency took the blame for the NATO strike by 
saying out-dated maps resulted in laser guided bombs hitting the Chinese 
embassy instead of a nearby Yugoslav military depot.

China still insists the attack was deliberate.


Reply via email to