Feedback from M-Fem on Neo-classical gas

2000-07-05 Thread Charles Brown
> I'm starting to wonder about my sanity in re: the pile-up > of gross distortions of n-c theory in the past week. > > ___ > CB: From Martha Gimenez's homepage (http://csf.colorado.edu/gimenez/): > > "It seems that the "neoclassical paradigm"--the HIV virus of economics- --has spread and i

Re: Neo-classical gas

2000-06-30 Thread Jim Devine
At 01:29 PM 6/30/00 -0700, you wrote: >The straw breaking the proverbial camel's back was the stuff about >methodological individualism as the fallacious root of fallacious >econ. Evidently some critics gloss over the fact that macro-theory is >not based on "adding up" the decisions of indivi

Re: Re: Neo-classical gas

2000-06-30 Thread Charles Brown
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/01/00 02:22AM >>> > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/30/00 04:29PM >>> > I'm starting to wonder about my sanity in re: the pile-up > of gross distortions of n-c theory in the past week. > > ___ > CB: From Martha Gimenez's homepage (http://csf.colorado.edu/gimenez/): > > "It

Re: Re: Neo-classical gas

2000-06-30 Thread Max Sawicky
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/30/00 04:29PM >>> > I'm starting to wonder about my sanity in re: the pile-up > of gross distortions of n-c theory in the past week. > > ___ > CB: From Martha Gimenez's homepage (http://csf.colorado.edu/gimenez/): > > "It seems that the "neoclassical paradigm"--the H

Re: Neo-classical gas

2000-06-30 Thread Charles Brown
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/30/00 04:29PM >>> I'm starting to wonder about my sanity in re: the pile-up of gross distortions of n-c theory in the past week. ___ CB: From Martha Gimenez's homepage (http://csf.colorado.edu/gimenez/): "It seems that the "neoclassical paradigm"--the HIV virus of

re: Neo-classical gas

2000-06-30 Thread Rod Hay
Since it was me who wrote this I will respond. Max is right that in a partial equilibrium model, the welfare of others can be included as a variable in a utility function. But if it is done in a general equilibrium model, the number of variables exceeds the number of equations and there is no uniq

Neo-classical gas

2000-06-29 Thread Max Sawicky
I'm starting to wonder about my sanity in re: the pile-up of gross distortions of n-c theory in the past week. This is not to say there are legions of things to criticize in NC theory, but I have to wonder what sort of picture people have gotten (or devised by themselves). I'm no theoretical wiz