In a message dated 98-04-07 23:02:42 EDT, nathan newman writes:
I'm less excited than interested in it as a piece of evidence on the
conservative divisions that are growing and paralyzing much of the rightwing
agenda.
I also happen to think that Buchanan is one of the more honest
michael wrote:
Pat Buchanan might not be a fascist, but I think that we have to give him
credit for fashioning the language of hate that has become the mainstay of
modern politics.
He deserves to share that credit with Kevin Phillips, who has become
something of a darling of the liberals these
MScoleman wrote:
I also happen to think that Buchanan is one of the more honest conservatives,
however lothesome his beliefs. He has become no less conservative, just
evolved into a different species than the liberatarian globalists that came to
dominate the Republicans under Reagan.
In a message dated 98-04-08 12:39:55 EDT, michael perelman writes:
MScoleman [DID NOT WRITE THIS -- SOMEONE ELSE DID] wrote:
I also happen to think that Buchanan is one of the more honest
conservatives,
however lothesome his beliefs. He has become no less conservative, just
evolved
At 03:19 PM 4/7/98 -0700, Jim Devine wrote:
valis writes: Get excited if you (pl.) must, but I wouldn't believe
Buchanan if he stated the color of his eyes. This loathsome lizard, who
has spent his entire life turning sentences around, is simply testing the
fickle winds for another crack at the
Nathan Newman exults:
This column by Pat Buchanan is remarkable in its near-repudiation of his
old boss, Ronald Reagan, arguing that economic conservatism is ultimately
the enemy of the social conservatism that is Buchanan's true loyalty. (In
this, he echoes scholar Daniel Bell's thesis on
valis writes: Get excited if you (pl.) must, but I wouldn't believe
Buchanan if he stated the color of his eyes. This loathsome lizard, who
has spent his entire life turning sentences around, is simply testing the
fickle winds for another crack at the presidency, where he'd do...what?
I don't
Nathan Newman exults:
This column by Pat Buchanan is remarkable in its near-repudiation of his
old boss, Ronald Reagan, arguing that economic conservatism is ultimately
the enemy of the social conservatism that is Buchanan's true loyalty. (In
this, he echoes scholar Daniel Bell's thesis on
Pat Buchanan might not be a fascist, but I think that we have to give him
credit for fashioning the language of hate that has become the mainstay of
modern politics.
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail [EMAIL
Just a question, how much credence are we going to give Reagan and
Thatcher's tax cuts for economic growth? I see those tax cuts as
fueling the speculative commercial real estate and residential building boom
that both countries experienced, rather than any increases in real
investment. Any
At 02:05 PM 4/7/98 -0700, Pat Buchanan wrote:
But unbridled capitalism is also an awesome
destructive force. It makes men and women obsolete as rapidly as it does
the products they produce and the plants that employ them. And the people
made obsolete and insecure are workers, employees, "Reagan
This column by Pat Buchanan is remarkable in its near-repudiation of his
old boss, Ronald Reagan, arguing that economic conservatism is ultimately
the enemy of the social conservatism that is Buchanan's true loyalty. (In
this, he echoes scholar Daniel Bell's thesis on the cultural
contradictions
12 matches
Mail list logo
