Re: Re: O'Neill goes, Bono stays

2002-12-07 Thread Nomiprins
In a message dated 12/7/2002 11:07:00 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Eh? Why did Wall Street rally on the announcement of his departure, after taking an early morning hit on the weak U.S. employment report? They never liked him. It'll be very interesting to see if Bush

RE: Re: O'Neill goes, Bono stays

2002-12-07 Thread Devine, James
Title: RE: [PEN-L:32842] Re: O'Neill goes, Bono stays Chris Burford wrote: O'Neill with hindsight looks like the uncomfortable pathetic puppet of finance capital he was. Doug: Eh? Why did Wall Street rally on the announcement of his departure, after taking an early morning hit

Re: RE: Re: O'Neill goes, Bono stays

2002-12-07 Thread Ian Murray
- Original Message - From: Devine, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] why not go for greatness, appointing another oil man to the job? Jim == Isn't Ken Lay looking for work? Ian

Re: RE: Re: O'Neill goes, Bono stays

2002-12-07 Thread Doug Henwood
Devine, James wrote: why not go for greatness, appointing another oil man to the job? Because Treasury is supposed to be Wall Street's personal branch of government! Doug

Re: Re: RE: Re: O'Neill goes, Bono stays

2002-12-07 Thread Eugene Coyle
Ken Lay hasn't been pardoned yet. (Dubya doesn't want to presume guilt.) Elliot Abrams has already been pardoned but just took a different job. Ian Murray wrote: - Original Message - From: Devine, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] why not go for greatness, appointing another oil man to the job?