Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Re: query: Frank Ramsey]

2001-03-02 Thread J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
t. Barkley Rosser -Original Message- From: Eugene Coyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thursday, March 01, 2001 7:31 PM Subject: [PEN-L:8583] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Re: query: Frank Ramsey] Thanks, Barkley. Now I have to think about this.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Re: query: Frank Ramsey]

2001-03-02 Thread Jim Devine
Barkley writes: The new wave coming out of these discussions has been hyperbolic discounting where a high discount rate is used to discount the near term future, but a lower and lower rate approaching zero is used to discount the far distant future. In practice, of course, long-term

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Re: query: Frank Ramsey]

2001-03-02 Thread J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
: Re: query: Frank Ramsey] Barkley writes: The new wave coming out of these discussions has been hyperbolic discounting where a high discount rate is used to discount the near term future, but a lower and lower rate approaching zero is used to discount the far distant future. In practice

Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Re: query: Frank Ramsey]

2001-03-01 Thread Eugene Coyle
My confusion, I guess, is which practice Ramsey is saying is "ethically indefensible." Is "not discounting" ethically indefensible? Or is it discounting which is "ethically indefensible"? I should have paid more attention the year they were teaching diagramming sentences. I didn't, so I'm

RE: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Re: query: Frank Ramsey]

2001-03-01 Thread Lisa Ian Murray
Eugene, To "not discount" means to treat the "future enjoyments" as equal in value to present ones. That means using a zero discount rate. There are a lot of people in environmental and ecological economics who argue for this, along with a lot of others, including some from the

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Re: query: Frank Ramsey]

2001-03-01 Thread J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
Eugene Coyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thursday, March 01, 2001 4:31 PM Subject: [PEN-L:8571] Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Re: query: Frank Ramsey] My confusion, I guess, is which practice Ramsey is saying is "ethically indefensible." Is

RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Re: query: Frank Ramsey]

2001-03-01 Thread Lisa Ian Murray
5. Barkley Rosser -Original Message- From: Eugene Coyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thursday, March 01, 2001 4:31 PM Subject: [PEN-L:8571] Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Re: query: Frank Ramsey] My confusion, I guess, is which practice Ramsey is saying i

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Re: query: Frank Ramsey]

2001-03-01 Thread Eugene Coyle
h 01, 2001 4:31 PM Subject: [PEN-L:8571] Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Re: query: Frank Ramsey] My confusion, I guess, is which practice Ramsey is saying is "ethically indefensible." Is "not discounting" ethically indefensible? Or is it discounting which is "ethically inde