RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: important news for parents of young kids

2001-04-27 Thread Eric Nilsson
Jim D wrote, including (yuk!) Pokemon You got to get into Rugrats. We don't have cable so we only see it via rented videos every few weeks (you also avoid the commercials that way!). One could argue that Rugrats is a bit subversive--as much or more so than the Simpsons. It certainly is very

Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: important news for parents of young kids

2001-04-27 Thread Jim Devine
I wrote: But Hollywood produces dreck (1) because people want it, Eric writes: In other contexts I'm sure Jim could be more careful not to make such an extreme claim. How kids, and parents, come to want low culture is a complex process mostly involved, I think, with the nature of

RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: important news for parents of young kids

2001-04-27 Thread Eric Nilsson
Jim wrote, yeah, tastes are a dependent variable, but that doesn't say that people don't have bad taste a lot of the time (and I don't exclude myself from this). The key is not whether you have bad tastes, but whether you feel _guilty_ for having bad taste: that is, whether you have

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: important news for parents of young kids

2001-04-27 Thread Jim Devine
At 12:53 PM 4/27/01 -0700, you wrote: The key is not whether you have bad tastes, but whether you feel _guilty_ for having bad taste: of course! guilt makes the world go 'round. Ah, the good old days. Jim, were you at Berkeley when the DKs were starting out (circa 1977, I think)? Yes, but I