- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 5:23 PM
Subject: [PEN-L:23465] Re: Re: Suppression of Marx
___
Dear Melvin, before becoming a researcher, I was a worker and an Union
leader, like you
In a message dated 3/5/2002 6:14:29 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dear Melvin, before becoming a researcher, I was a worker and an Union
leader, like you. And I believed in "historical materialism", too. I
believed in it, because having not yet visited history by myself, I
There is a difference between making an unconvincing argument of logical
inconsistency and claiming a logical inconsistency without any attempt
to demonstrate it (By the way, I never understood the Sraffian
argument against the LTV as in general based on logical inconsistency--I
thought it was
Was Sraffa a Sraffian/neo-Ricardian; did he ever go beyond critiquing
neo-classical garbage?
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 10:07:16AM -0600, Forstater, Mathew wrote:
There is a difference between making an unconvincing argument of logical
inconsistency and claiming a logical inconsistency without
In a message dated 3/4/2002 7:17:33 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MARX AND HIS POSTERITY
Admittedly the founder of what has been the working-class movement shares
some responsibility in the confusion of the thought that is meant to be
Marxist or Marxism-related. But he did
Michael Perelman
I don't agree with Romer [Roemer], but as Jim D.? observed, he probably
caused
more people to take a look at Marx. If some of these people read Marx
with intelligence, so much the better.
it's important to be careful with spelling here, since there are at least
two
PROTECTED] http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
-Original Message-
From: Michael Perelman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 8:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PEN-L:23464] Re: RE: Suppression of Marx
Was Sraffa a Sraffian/neo-Ricardian; did he ever go
Was Sraffa a Sraffian/neo-Ricardian; did he ever go beyond critiquing
neo-classical garbage?
No we wasn't one, and no he didn't Personally, I have some reason to think
he was a Stalinist When I was at Cambs I was friends with a grad student of
his who said that in his rooms he had Stalin's
Anyway, it was Justin who said that Roemer probably caused more people to
take a look at Marx or something like that I don't know if that
encouraged
people to read Marx with intelligence
Wasn't me, but I think it's true As far as his effect on economists, I
can't say He made _me_ read Marx a
10:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PEN-L:23464] Re: RE: Suppression of Marx
Was Sraffa a Sraffian/neo-Ricardian; did he ever go beyond critiquing
neo-classical garbage?
Dear Melvin P.,
Could you go slower, please, and fill in the gaps for me? I don't
understand your references. Could you give examples?
I did get the point about Southern cotton production being
(capitalist) commodity production, even though Black slaves, not
free workers, produced the cotton,
11 matches
Mail list logo
