G'day Michael,
Whilst I am wholly aware of JMK's insistence that a fight between the
bourgeoisie and the great unwashed would find him firmly on the side of the
former, I still think there's room for a generous reading of all this. It
seems, for instance, wholly consistent with the writings of,
Michael Perelman wrote:
Hayek, F. A. 1952. "Review of Harrod's Life of J. M. Keynes." Journal of
Modern History, 24: 2 (June).
197: Keynes "had not long before coined the phrase of the
"euthanasia of the rentier," and in a deliberate to draw him
out I k the next
On Wednesday, April 26, 2000 at 12:54:36 (-0400) Doug Henwood writes:
Michael Perelman wrote:
Hayek, F. A. 1952. "Review of Harrod's Life of J. M. Keynes." Journal of
Modern History, 24: 2 (June).
197: Keynes "had not long before coined the phrase of the
"euthanasia of the
Doug Henwood quoted Keynes as follows:
"We were not aware that civilisation was a thin and precarious crust
erected by the personality and will of a very few, and only
maintained by rules and conventions skilfully put across and
guilefully preserved. We had no respect for traditional
I think, for instance, Habermas's recounting of the significance of
French
salons and British tea houses (the 'bourgeois public sphere') is
important
stuff. There, the nascent bourgeoisie articulated and substantiated the
great (bourgeois) revolutionary age. Humanity was redefined, and human
Subject:
Offer of Internship
Date:
Wed, 26 Apr 2000 13:16:23 +0200
From:
"Christoph Erdmenger" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Offer of Internship
Assistant in ICLEIs Eco-Procurement and Eco-Efficient Economy
Programme
The International Council
Doug Henwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/26/00 12:54PM "How can I accept a doctrine
[Marxism] which sets up as its
bible...an obsolete economic textbook which I know to be not only
scientifically erroneous but without interest or application for the
modern world? How can I adopt a creed which,
