I never said liberal is left and conservative is right in the neat, schematic
way you attribute to me. You're quite correct that the discourse of
conservatism has a "liberal" flavor to it on cultural/reproductive issues,
just as "liberals" have adopted a "conservative" conception of the
Mark:
Your argument is seriously marred by the notion of Nader as a political
detour. The implication is that in his absence, the mass anger would assume
a more acceptable form. I believe in critical support of Nader, but I reject
both of your premises. At this time, at least in electoral
ubject: [PEN-L:21072] Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Position in
theWorld-System and National Emissions of]
Mark, please, stop characterizing others. I suspect that if you wrote in
more
temporate terms, Doug would probably agree with much that you say. You
know
that he loves to play the de
This reading of current American politics is absolutely breath-taking in its
misjudgments. This is the U.S. in the year 2000, not Russia in 1902; we may have
turned the corner after 25 years gravitating right, but we are not in anything
remotely resembling a pre-revolutionary situation; and
Joel Blau wrote:
This reading of current American politics is absolutely
breath-taking in its
misjudgments. This is the U.S. in the year 2000, not Russia in
1902; we may have
turned the corner after 25 years gravitating right, but we are
not in anything
remotely resembling a
Perelman
Sent: 30 June 2000 17:05
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PEN-L:21029] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Position in
theWorld-System and National Emissions of]
Jim is absolutely correct here. I on only barely on line. I am
in Vancouver
for the History of Economics meetings. Please. I
