I don't get it. What would it be like not to separate livestock from grain?
Have the livestock wandering through your grain fields? What system of
agriculture ever suggested that. Maybe I am being flippant, but what you say
makes absolutely no sense to me. Livestock are not separated from pasture
Ken Hanly:
>available locally. Even hay may be trucked long distances in case of local
shortages, but this would be the exception not the rule. Feed materials are
>bought by feedlots from the nearest sources.
You don't seem to get the point. It is not simply about closeness or
distance. It is abo
Is this in contrast to non-trivial tautologies?
Cheers, Ken Hanly
Carrol Cox wrote:
> Doug Henwood wrote:
>
> > M A Jones wrote:
> >
> > >But capitalism will collapse anyway.
> >
> > Right. Where have I heard that one before?
>
> Actually the prediction was made by many old guys millenia ag
Well, Carroll, I certainly like to see you raise the level of discourse. So it's
arrogant and stupid and in bad faith of Doug to ask for a reason to think that we
could do better if we made some sort of change in a direction you would consider
socialist. well, sign me up to the arrogant, stupid
Carrol Cox wrote:
>Bullshit Doug. On the contrary, any statement of the kind you want
>would be arrogant and stupid, not merely utopian. No one except
>a few academics and journalists (I ignore sheer demogogues) has
>ever taken up resistance to capitalism on the basis of being convinced
>there is
Doug Henwood wrote:
> Charles Brown wrote:
>
> >To purport to answer your question fully would be to assume the
> >approach of a utopian. The answer to your question must come in
> >the main from the practice, trial and error, of billions of people.
>
> This is evasive. I'm not asking for a 2
Doug Henwood wrote:
> M A Jones wrote:
>
> >But capitalism will collapse anyway.
>
> Right. Where have I heard that one before?
Actually the prediction was made by many old guys millenia ago
before capitalism was ever heard of. You know, the old stuff about
the rise and fall of this or that. O
M A Jones wrote:
>But capitalism will collapse anyway.
Right. Where have I heard that one before?
Doug
