>>I thought I was pretty mild.
>
>Referring to your interlocutor as desperate and inward turning is
>clearly not mild,
I refereed to the theory that way, and not to any of its advocates.
but I suspect that I shall be blamed for the
>rancor
>on the list as I was supposed to take the heat for Paul
>
>I thought I was pretty mild.
Referring to your interlocutor as desperate and inward turning is
clearly not mild, but I suspect that I shall be blamed for the rancor
on the list as I was supposed to take the heat for Paul Phillips'
explosion.
>
>>
>>Moreover, note that I raised the questio
>
>Justin, you expect us to move on after you characterize my attempts
>as inward turning--this is exactly what the Marxian law of value is
>not!
Well, I'm out of energy, anyway.
And these are not the points I am after, as should be clear to
>you after years of debate. There is a willful ignora
