In a message dated 12/24/2002 4:54:47 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Of course the DP exists for the sole purpose of preventing such action
-- i.e. for the purpose of preventing self-knowledge, in the sense
defined above, among the general public. The DP is the chief center
In a message dated 12/23/2002 8:21:06 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
so why advertise the
fact that business as usual continues and that the looting will not stop so
long as there is something to loot.
Kind of apropos of another song from Chicago, performed by the lawyer
Nomi wrote:
The thing is, I want to believe that the general
public, armed with accurate information, is smarter
than That.
I think both general public and smartness are loose categories that
hinder clarity of analysis. The general public, actually, does not
exist, but is merely a label we
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's rather astonishing, the mainstream media is gloating about
Spitzer's
'hardball tactics' in 'bringing down the beast' before the end of the
year.
Like, the banks really wanted to continue the fine negotiation process
into
2003. One of
Hegel must be howling with laughter.
Guiliani as tragedy, Spitzer as farce?
Michael
In a message dated 12/23/2002 1:54:25 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Guiliani as tragedy, Spitzer as farce
So, who plays Spitzer in the movie about how the little guy beats the corporations in time for Christmas?
Nomi
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 12/23/02 10:16:45 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There was an instant poll on
the CBS MarketWatch site last Friday that asked readers whether they
thought
this settlement was severe enough on the banks, and 80% said no. That's
Michael Pollak wrote:
Hegel must be howling with laughter.
Guiliani as tragedy, Spitzer as farce?
And/or Miiken as creator, Grubman as destroyer.
Doug
