- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 5:23 PM
Subject: [PEN-L:23465] Re: Re: Suppression of Marx
___
Dear Melvin, before becoming a researcher, I was a worker and an Union
leader, like you
In a message dated 3/5/2002 6:14:29 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dear Melvin, before becoming a researcher, I was a worker and an Union
leader, like you. And I believed in "historical materialism", too. I
believed in it, because having not yet visited history by myself, I
PROTECTED] http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
-Original Message-
From: Michael Perelman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 8:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PEN-L:23464] Re: RE: Suppression of Marx
Was Sraffa a Sraffian/neo-Ricardian; did he ever go
Was Sraffa a Sraffian/neo-Ricardian; did he ever go beyond critiquing
neo-classical garbage?
No we wasn't one, and no he didn't Personally, I have some reason to think
he was a Stalinist When I was at Cambs I was friends with a grad student of
his who said that in his rooms he had Stalin's
Anyway, it was Justin who said that Roemer probably caused more people to
take a look at Marx or something like that I don't know if that
encouraged
people to read Marx with intelligence
Wasn't me, but I think it's true As far as his effect on economists, I
can't say He made _me_ read Marx a
10:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PEN-L:23464] Re: RE: Suppression of Marx
Was Sraffa a Sraffian/neo-Ricardian; did he ever go beyond critiquing
neo-classical garbage?
