Thanks for the clarification, Mine, I'll bear it in mind.
Mark Jones
http://www.egroups.com/group/CrashList
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2000 12:54 AM
Subject: [PEN-L:19914] Re: Re: Re: Re: The Nader campaign, part 1 (fwd
In a message dated Tue, 6 Jun 2000 4:42:38 AM Eastern Daylight Time, "M A Jones"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Justin, you have a way of telling me things I already know while not
answering the real point, which is about your strange affection for the
glorious 'C' especially the notably
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 6/5/00 6:25:09 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oh yes, the propertied minority needs vigorous protection against the
masses. Just ask Madison, Federalist #10.
I was thinking more of the 14th Amendment, due process, equal
At 12:54 PM 6/6/00 -0400, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 6/5/00 6:25:09 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oh yes, the propertied minority needs vigorous protection against the
masses. Just ask Madison, Federalist #10.
I was thinking more of the
Justin wrote:
So, if you accept that refiorms are good and necessary, you have to
support lobbuing for and otherwise trying to effect them through the
esrablished channels. Otherwise, you will be out in the streets yelling
for reforms that will be implemented, if at all, without your
What did I do to make you think I would disagree with this? --jks
This distinction (reform through established channels vs. yelling in the
streets) is a false dichotomy. The two are connected and interact with each
other.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The comments about Jefferson and the Constitution are almost too silly to
discuss. J was no great fan of the C, which he did not sign precisely because
of its comparative conservatism, And as for the anti-majoritarainsim od the
C, and especially the Bill of Rights, is
discrete and insular minorities protected by the "C" were/are who
exactly? Blacks? American Indians? Women? Hispanics? Bankers?
Mark Jones
http://www.egroups.com/group/CrashList
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The comments about Jefferson and the Constitution are almost too silly to
discuss. J
Mark,
I would never put blacks, Indians, women and hispanics in the same
equation with bankers. they are the victim, not the oppresssor..
Mine
discrete and insular minorities protected by the "C" were/are who
exactly? Blacks? American Indians? Women? Hispanics? Bankers?
Mark Jones
In a message dated 6/5/00 6:25:09 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oh yes, the propertied minority needs vigorous protection against the
masses. Just ask Madison, Federalist #10.
I was thinking more of the 14th Amendment, due process, equal protection,
that sort of
In a message dated 6/5/00 6:34:01 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
discrete and insular minorities protected by the "C" were/are who
exactly? Blacks? American Indians? Women? Hispanics? Bankers?
The phrase is from the famous (to Americal lawyers) footnote 4 of the 1939
In a message dated 6/5/00 7:54:58 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mark,
I would never put blacks, Indians, women and hispanics in the same
equation with bankers. they are the victim, not the oppresssor..
Mine
Mine, you really are irony proof. Go syeep yourself in
In a message dated 6/5/00 7:54:58 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mark,
I would never put blacks, Indians, women and hispanics in the same
equation with bankers. they are the victim, not the oppresssor..
Mine
Mine, you really are irony proof. Go syeep yourself
66] Re: Re: Re: The Nader campaign, part 1
The political criticism of Nadar is valid, but the personal attack on him
is
misguided and fundamentally irrelevant.
Rod
Louis Proyect wrote:
Yes, but not that much further. My parents, who lived on my dad's
middle
class income of about $25,
In a message dated 00-06-03 21:11:11 EDT, you write:
The main point is that it wasn't an $85 per month furnished room.
be bought. If he stayed silent on no-fault, it was not because he was
bribed,
but because there are serious consumerist arguments against it. There are,
The problem
Mark Jones has discovered that anything but the self-described express
movement for the revolutionmary overthrow of capitalsim is a distraction;
reforms that merely improve people's livesw ithin existing constrints are
bad. Hey, Mark, why doesn't this distrction theorya pply to a movement for
In a message dated 6/3/00 4:31:32 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
I don't know about Washington, but where I live a $100,000 home is pretty
modest. (and that is Canadian dollars!)
Rod
$100,000 went further 25 years ago.
Yes, but not that much further. My parents,
The political criticism of Nadar is valid, but the personal attack on him is
misguided and fundamentally irrelevant.
Rod
Louis Proyect wrote:
Yes, but not that much further. My parents, who lived on my dad's middle
class income of about $25,000 a year back in those days, bought a $100,000
18 matches
Mail list logo
