In a message dated 9/21/00 4:58:37 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< His main point seems to be a relatively common-sense explanation of the
"solution" to the "transformation problem" that Fred Moseley advocates. See
the latter's article in the current _Review of Radical
At 07:19 PM 9/21/00 -0400, you wrote:
>Max Sawicky wrote:
>
>>Alert. Alert. Value theory thread incoming.
>>Take cover.
>
>Value theory? What's that?
>
>Doug
economists know the price everything and the value of nothing...
Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
Max Sawicky wrote:
>Alert. Alert. Value theory thread incoming.
>Take cover.
Value theory? What's that?
Doug
At 04:37 PM 9/21/00 -0400, you wrote:
>Jim,
>I don't have the book yet and will not be able to get it probably for a
>while, so could you please comment or reproduce Andrews' discussion (main
>points or how his proposed solution differ or reproduces other previous
>solutions) of the transformat
At 04:37 PM 9/21/00 -0400, you wrote:
>Jim,
>I don't have the book yet and will not be able to get it probably for a
>while, so could you please comment or reproduce Andrews' discussion (main
>points or how his proposed solution differ or reproduces other previous
>solutions) of the transformat
