Re: Re:The Rise and Future Demise of World-Systems Analysis

2000-07-13 Thread Mine Aysen Doyran
Ricardo Duchesne wrote: Mine Aysen Doyran wrote: Why don't you have a look at Giovanni Arrighi's piece on this debate I posted a while ago? "It would be easy to dismiss Brenner's critique as being based on a highly selective reading of Marx. In this reading there is no room for

Re: Re: Re:The Rise and Future Demise of World-Systems Analysis

2000-07-13 Thread Ricardo Duchesne
On 13 Jul 00, at 11:19, Mine Aysen Doyran wrote: most notably the thesis that the formation of a Eurocentric world market in the sixteenth century was the single most important condition for the emergence of capitalist production in Western Europe, England included, in the following

Re: Re: Re:The Rise and Future Demise of World-Systems Analysis

2000-07-12 Thread Stephen E Philion
This is exactly on the mark imho Steve On Wed, 12 Jul 2000, Jim Devine wrote: I don't think Wallerstein ever claimed to be a Marxist, though he clearly learned from Marx Marxists and Marxist can learn some from his research. (In this, he is very similar to Barrington Moore.)

Re: Re: Re:The Rise and Future Demise of World-Systems Analysis

2000-07-12 Thread Stephen E Philion
Mine wrote: World System Marxism overcomes two limitations of Analytical Marxism in 5 *weak* areas 1) methodolological individualism Steve writes: I've never heard world system theorists addressing themselves to the AM question actually...and of course Marxists like Brenner, Petras,..have

Re: Re: Re: Re:The Rise and Future Demise of World-Systems Analysis

2000-07-12 Thread Mine Aysen Doyran
Stephen E Philion wrote: Mine wrote: World System Marxism overcomes two limitations of Analytical Marxism in 5 *weak* areas 1) methodolological individualism Steve writes: I've never heard world system theorists addressing themselves to the AM question actually...and of course