Gar:
>>>Carrol - I think you are overlooking the demand here. We are
>>>dealing with a government doing the wrong thing against terrorist
>>>who have killed a lot of people in the U.S. and successfully
>>>terrorized them. We are opposed to the evil things this government
>>>is doing in respon
om: Yoshie Furuhashi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 7:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PEN-L:20178] Re: What is to be done about Everything?
Gar:
>Carrol - I think you are overlooking the demand here. We are dealing
>with a government doi
Sorry - did no realize this was a closed topic. I have replied to
several comments on my comments - but now that I see your post will
reply to no more on this list.
Michael Perelman wrote:
> I thought that we had put this to bed.
>
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 08:43:51PM -0800, Gar Lipow wrote:
Yoshie Furuhashi wrote:
> Gar:
>
>> Carrol - I think you are overlooking the demand here. We are dealing
>> with a government doing the wrong thing against terrorist who have
>> killed a lot of people in the U.S. and successfully terrorized them.
>> We are opposed to the evil things this go
Gar:
>Carrol - I think you are overlooking the demand here. We are dealing
>with a government doing the wrong thing against terrorist who have
>killed a lot of people in the U.S. and successfully terrorized them.
>We are opposed to the evil things this government is doing in
>response. We nee
I thought that we had put this to bed.
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 08:43:51PM -0800, Gar Lipow wrote:
>
> In response to a post by Carroll, I said:
>
> >We>need to be able to answer the question: "what would you do if you were
> >in charge?".
> >>
> >
>
> Devine, James wrote in reply:
>
>
> >
In response to a post by Carroll, I said:
>We>need to be able to answer the question: "what would you do if you were
>in charge?".
>>
>
Devine, James wrote in reply:
> I sometimes say "this is what I would do if I were in charge" (such as not
> terror-bombing Afghanistan) but I immediately
> We
> need to be able to answer the question: "what would you do if you were
> in charge?".
I sometimes say "this is what I would do if I were in charge" (such as not
terror-bombing Afghanistan) but I immediately qualify this by stating that
it's impossible that such policies would be implemen
Gar Lipow wrote:
>
>
>
> Carrol - I think ...
> We
> need to be able to answer the question: "what would you do if you were
> in charge?".
I and others, on this list and elsewhere, have put the arguments against
this about as fully as they can be, so endlessly repeating them seem
futile. A
Carrol Cox wrote:
> ". . . what do you pacifists and fatalists and revolutionary defeatists
> suggest be done? Just let them be? Act nice? Invite them over for
> coffee?"
>
> This simply baffles me. All I can do is give a series of anecdotes,
> fictional and actual.
>
> The nice thing about
10 matches
Mail list logo
