> There's an article in the Braudel Center journal I referred to yesterday
> (in reference to Frank and his critics )dealing with Maori capitalism in
> New Zealand, which is apparently influenced by regulation theory.
> Wallerstein also refers to it in his article as one o
"Christian A. Gregory" wrote:
>
> Bob Jessop has a fairly easy to read and very good intro to regulation
> theory in Michael Storper and Allen Scott, "Pathways to Industrialization
> and Regional Development."
>I'd also reccommend Alice Amsden'
Howdee,
Regulation theory has any number of origins--Alain Lipietz, one its
exemplars, argued that the analyses of "regulation" were in part an attempt
to push the limits of Althusser's notion of "reproduction" in such a way as
to imagine how different kinds of externa
recognized and
described. That the history of capitalism can be periodized according the
changing types of insitutions that regulate it.
Rod
Nathan Newman wrote:
> Without claiming great expertise and relying on memory of readings from a
> number of years ago, Regulation theory refers larg
Without claiming great expertise and relying on memory of readings from a
number of years ago, Regulation theory refers largely to a framework of
analysis echoing Gramsci's Fordist analysis arguing that late capitalism in
the 1930s entered into a new form of social organization where regu
There's an article in the Braudel Center journal I referred to yesterday
(in reference to Frank and his critics )dealing with Maori capitalism in
New Zealand, which is apparently influenced by regulation theory.
Wallerstein also refers to it in his article as one of among different
conte
At 1:07 PM 12/13/95, Doug Henwood wrote:
>At 12:15 PM 12/13/95, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>I was very interested in Terry McDonough's comments about Sam Bowles
>> being a "one-man crisis of Marxism," and the general drift to the Right
>> of a lot of left economists. I've found the discussion of
At 12:15 PM 12/13/95, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I was very interested in Terry McDonough's comments about Sam Bowles
> being a "one-man crisis of Marxism," and the general drift to the Right
> of a lot of left economists. I've found the discussion of the Regulationists
> interesting, but Terry h
On Wed, 13 Dec 1995 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I was very interested in Terry McDonough's comments about Sam Bowles
> being a "one-man crisis of Marxism," and the general drift to the Right
> of a lot of left economists. I've found the discussion of the Regulationists
> interesting, but Terry
I was very interested in Terry McDonough's comments about Sam Bowles
being a "one-man crisis of Marxism," and the general drift to the Right
of a lot of left economists. I've found the discussion of the Regulationists
interesting, but Terry has highlighted a broader phenomenon. What
explains
ecently discussed history of Regulation theory
demonstrates (to take another instance Marxist feminism has recently
degenerated into individual agency theory cf. Folbre and McCrate [hi!
if you're out there]). Thus most frameworks of thought will have
more Marxist and less Marxist pract
Re Terry McDonough's message on Regulation/SSA theory.
I agree that there are lots of problems with how SSA theory and
Regulation theory go about constructing themselves.
First, I believe they often mistake the contingent for the
fundamental. Terry McDonough writes, about
>the
12 matches
Mail list logo