[An interesting addendum to the segment in F-9/11 about the paucity of patrols
in the National Parks in Washington State]

[It was only yesterday I heard a radio commentator wrongly holding this up as
an example of a Moore-ish distortion because he thought it was a matter of
state budgets that Bush didn't directly control.]

   http://slate.msn.com/id/2103739/

   chatterbox    Gossip, speculation, and scuttlebutt about politics.
   Gagging the Fuzz, Part 6

   The Park Service formally terminates its truth-telling police chief.
   By Timothy Noah
   Posted Monday, July 12, 2004, at 5:47 AM PT

   The National Park Service formally terminated Teresa Chambers on July
   9. Chambers is the Park Police chief who was canned this past December
   for answering truthfully some questions posed to her by a Washington
   Post reporter about how budget constraints had forced a reduction in
   police patrols in parks and on parkways around Washington, D.C. For
   months prior to that interview, we now know from an affidavit Chambers
   filed June 28, Chambers had been harassed by her two superiors,
   National Park Service Director Fran Mainella and Deputy Director Don
   Murphy, over her refusal to disguise within the Park Service and its
   parent agency, the Interior Department, these patrol reductions. (The
   reductions were potentially embarrassing because the Bush White House
   doesn't want to admit, even to itself, that it's not putting its money
   where its mouth is on homeland defense.) The National Park Service put
   Chambers on administrative leave for her sins. The expectation was
   that it would fire her. Now it has.

   The timing is significant. Earlier that day, Chambers had filed a
   motion with the Merit Systems Protection Board, which adjudicates
   whistleblower complaints by federal workers, urging the MSPB to
   reinstate her in her job pending its final ruling and to prevent the
   Park Service from formally dismissing her. The Park Service responded
   within hours by firing Chambers before the MSPB could rule on her
   motion, thereby mooting it.

   The MSPB will still rule, however, on whether the Park Service's
   firing constitutes illegal retaliation against a whistleblower, which
   clearly it does. Chambers, alas, will have to proceed without the help
   of the Office of Special Counsel, a federal agency that argues
   whistleblower complaints before the MSPB. The OSC agreed to take
   Chambers' case in February, but for inexplicable reasons it failed to
   act within the customary 120 days. "We just continued to give them
   extensions," Chambers told Chatterbox. After "about three weeks,"
   however, Chambers decided to file her own complaint, as the law
   allows. The June 28 affidavit and the July 9 motion were both part of
   that effort. As is usual under such circumstances, the OSC will now
   withdraw from the case.

   Chambers says she has no idea why the OSC moved so slowly on so simple
   a case: "I know the investigator was very thorough." But Public
   Employees for Environmental Responsibility, a private advocacy group
   that has been publicizing Chambers' case, notes pointedly that the
   special counsel, Scott Block, is "a recent Bush appointee."
   Insinuation: Politics inspired foot-dragging. But Chatterbox has to
   believe that the net political effect of Chambers' case--particularly
   her abrupt firing last week, which leaves her without a salary--will
   be political embarrassment for the Bushies. Maybe it's time for
   candidate John Kerry to start talking up the Park Police chief's
   firing as an example of the Bush administration's willful blindness
   toward the consequences of its policies and its viciousness toward
   those who won't play along.

   Teresa Chambers Archive:
   April 14, 2004: "Gagging the Fuzz, Part 5"
   March 25, 2004: "Gagging the Fuzz, Part 4"
   Feb. 19, 2004: "Gagging the Fuzz, Part 3"
   Jan. 12, 2004: "Gagging the Fuzz, Part 2"
   Dec. 30, 2003: "Gagging the Fuzz"

Timothy Noah writes "Chatterbox" for Slate.

Reply via email to