<http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-Outspoken-ONeill.html?pagewanted=al
l>
March 24, 2001
Treasury Secretary Ruffles Feathers
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Filed at 11:46 a.m. ET

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Asked if he had any words of assurance as millions of
investors watched their stock portfolios melt down this past week, the
president's chief economic spokesman demurred. Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill
did not see much benefit in opining on day-to-day market movements.

That reticence struck many as unusual. Not only had past secretaries spoken
calming words during turbulent times, but Wall Street's volatility is one of the
few things about which O'Neill has not made his opinion known recently.

During his first two months in office, O'Neill has managed to infuriate market
traders, perplex currency and bond investors, irk a powerful Democratic senator,
muddle the president's tax message and outrage conservatives with a memo on
global warming.

To O'Neill's supporters, the blunt-speaking former chief executive of aluminum
giant Alcoa, who bears a resemblance to Harry Truman, is bringing a refreshing
dose of candor.

Others wonder if the miscues are becoming a distraction for the administration's
leading salesman on behalf of President Bush's $1.6 trillion, 10-year tax cut.

``It is always hard for someone who has been a chief executive officer to move
into a political position where you have to be more careful about what you say.
But he has made more than the usual number of political and financial
stumbles,'' said David Wyss, chief economist at Standard & Poor's Corp.

O'Neill's independent thinking became apparent early. During his Senate
confirmation, he rejected the idea that Bush's tax cut should be sold as an
antidote for a recession even though the president at the time was promoting it
that way.

On his first trip to Wall Street as Treasury chief, O'Neill had to placate
executives unhappy with his comments in a newspaper interview that Wall Street
traders were people who ``sit in front of a flickering green screen'' all day
and were ``not the sort of people you would want to help you think about complex
questions.''

It was not long before O'Neill saw how powerful they were. They sent the value
of the dollar down sharply after O'Neill seemed to suggest in another interview
a change in America's strong-dollar policy.

O'Neill had to move quickly to clarify those remarks. Similarly, he had to
clarify later comments that sent the price of Treasury bonds plunging
temporarily because his words were seen as critical of a Treasury program to buy
back debt.

O'Neill said he was continuing to learn ``things you can't talk about if you are
Treasury secretary.'' Market analysts had their own take: The former corporate
executive was inexperienced in the ways of Wall Street, and it was showing.

``A Treasury secretary needs to be someone who understands markets and can stand
up at the right moment and make statements that people can believe and have
confidence in,'' said David Jones, chief economist at Aubrey G. Lanston & Co. in
New York. ``O'Neill has gotten off on the wrong foot.''

O'Neill's comments on bonds came at a briefing on Bush's budget that also
featured a tense exchange in which reporters repeatedly challenged him and other
administration officials to disclose what percentage of the tax cut would go to
the nation's wealthy.

Afterward, O'Neill mused, ``I've got to learn to control my temper.'' But the
next day, O'Neill, who often responds to questions with the brusqueness of a
business leader used to telling subordinates what to do, found himself in hot
water with Democrats at a Senate Budget Committee hearing.

Sen. Robert Byrd of West Virginia lectured O'Neill on the finer points of Senate
courtesy after O'Neill had interrupted the questioning of freshman Sen. Debbie
Stabenow, D-Mich. During the exchange with Stabenow, O'Neill said he wondered
whether people did not understand the Medicare program or ``whether it's just
convenient not to understand.''

It was Republicans' turn to fume after an O'Neill memo to the president urging
action on global climate change was leaked to the press, riling conservatives
who wanted to know why the Treasury secretary was offering advice on the issue.
O'Neill's aides say he was simply writing a confidential memo to Bush on an
issue then being debated in the administration.

O'Neill has been the subject of critical newspaper editorials and a biting
parody in the New Yorker magazine over his decision to hold onto about $100
million in Alcoa stock and stock options.

O'Neill argues that his decision was approved by government ethics officers and
he will refrain from taking any actions that could affect Alcoa interests.

But critics see the decision as an unwanted diversion for a new administration
trying to establish its claim of following higher ethical standards than the
Clinton administration.

Asked about the criticism, O'Neill spokeswoman Michelle Davis said, ``He is
doing the job the president asked him to do.''

There are no signs that Bush is losing faith in O'Neill.

O'Neill meets regularly with the president in the Oval Office to map strategy
for getting the tax cut through Congress. Once, on the spur of the moment at one
of those sessions, Bush asked to see the setup O'Neill has in his Treasury
office to monitor market movements. The request sent both men on an expedition
through the tunnel connecting the White House and Treasury, to the surprise of
workers in the Treasury basement.

At a news conference last Monday, the first trading day after the Dow Jones
industrial average had suffered its worst week of declines in 11 years, O'Neill
said ``markets go up and markets go down'' and he did not see any benefit in
commenting on day-to-day movements.

O'Neill, in a televised interview Friday, again stressed the need for a
long-term approach.

``People who are investors in the United States economy, in a broad general
sense, are going to do well over time,'' he said. ``Investors don't pull up
their turnips every day to find out if they are growing. They put them in the
ground and they grow them and over time they produce good value. That is what
investing is all about.''

Reply via email to