[driving a wedge between blue-green alliances?]

http://www.latimes.com

Tuesday, May 15, 2001 |
Labor Courted on Bush Reform Plan
 Politics: The meeting with union leaders prefaces today's
counterproposal by Democrats.
By RICHARD SIMON, EDWIN CHEN, Times Staff Writers


 WASHINGTON--The Bush administration aimed its energy policy campaign
at an unusual constituency Monday, telling union leaders that building
more power plants and increasing oil and gas drilling will mean more
jobs for their members.
     Vice President Dick Cheney and Labor Secretary Elaine Chao
courted leaders of about a dozen unions during a private White House
session that appeared designed to drive a wedge into the
labor-environmental coalition that has blocked previous pro-business
initiatives.
     "I don't think we're being used," Teamsters President James P.
Hoffa told reporters after the meeting. "Don't forget. American
workers will be solving this problem. They will be building the
resources to refine and generate new energy."
     It was the latest round in an escalating public relations battle
over the comprehensive national energy policy drafted by a task force
headed by Cheney. The plan will be unveiled Thursday by President
Bush.
     Today, House Democrats plan to gather at a Washington gas station
to announce their own formula for reducing the nation's energy
problems. It will call for immediate steps to address high energy
prices and supply shortages, such as asking federal regulators to
investigate allegations of price gouging.
     A group of 67 Democratic lawmakers sent Bush a letter Monday
urging him to pressure the Organization of Petroleum Exporting
Countries to increase world crude oil production.
     "Notwithstanding our confidence in your Cabinet's extensive
knowledge of and experience with the petroleum industry, we remain
concerned that your administration has done little at this late date
to address the coming crisis in gasoline prices," the letter says.
     Cheney reiterated his belief that there are no short-term fixes
for the combination of factors contributing to higher gasoline prices
nationwide and continuing shortages of electricity in California.
     The vice president criticized Gov. Gray Davis for suggesting that
the administration's opposition to electricity price controls is tied
to its political support from Texas-based energy producers who are
profiting off California's troubles.
     In the Associated Press interview, Cheney characterized appeals
for price controls and a federal investigation of gasoline prices as
"exactly the kind of misguided--I'm trying to think how to state this
gracefully--politically motivated policies we've had in the past."
     Cheney said Bush might back a reduction of the
18.4-cent-per-gallon federal gasoline tax, AP reported. Opponents say
such a move could threaten highway projects funded by the tax.
     The administration's comprehensive energy plan is expected to
call for opening more federal land to oil and gas exploration,
promoting increased use of nuclear power and streamlining the approval
process for power plants, gas pipelines and oil refineries.
     In addition, the plan is expected to propose a massive upgrade of
the nation's electricity transmission system, including granting
federal authorities eminent domain authority to acquire private
property for power transmission lines.
     Environmentalists and their Democratic allies contend the plan
leans too far toward the supply side. But the administration has said
it will include proposals to promote conservation, energy efficiency
and use of renewable energy sources.
     White House officials disputed the notion that the meeting with
union leaders was designed to divide the labor-environmental
coalition.
     Cheney was scheduled to meet today with advocates of renewable
energy sources, such as wind and solar power.
     Hoffa said his group was not provided with enough details of the
administration's energy plan to offer an immediate endorsement.
     Mike Mathis, government affairs director of the Teamsters, said,
"We're going to be supportive of a program that creates jobs."


Reply via email to