Re: new campaign reform idea

2001-05-26 Thread Chris Burford
It would still allow parties promoting the direct interests of capital much more resources than parties representing the interests of working people. Besides a nod and a wink can always be made subsequently. This proposal is truly reformist. The only merit is that it focuses attention on the

Re: Re: new campaign reform idea

2001-05-26 Thread Jim Devine
SLATE wrote: [Anonymous donantions of unlimited amounts.] A trusted financial institution say Vanguard sets up accounts in the names of all recognized candidates. If you want to contribute to Bush, you write a check to Vanguard with instructions to deposit it in the Bush account. Andrew

Re: Re: new campaign reform idea

2001-05-26 Thread Jim Devine
Chris B. wrote: It would still allow parties promoting the direct interests of capital much more resources than parties representing the interests of working people. of course, that's the way it is now. It seems to me that the proposal might set up a free rider problem in which ExxonMobil says

Re: Re: Re: new campaign reform idea

2001-05-26 Thread Andrew Hagen
On Sat, 26 May 2001 08:46:06 -0700, Jim Devine wrote: actually, the job of the central authority isn't to _identify_ corrupt behavior. Rather, its job is to prevent such behavior: [...] These two functions are not different in practice. If corrupt behavior is to be stopped it must be both

Re: new campaign reform idea

2001-05-26 Thread Michael Perelman
Of course, the Supreme Court would call the inability of a person to tell the politician about a donation, but then everybody could claim to have donated millions of $. -- Michael Perelman Economics Department California State University Chico, CA 95929 Tel. 530-898-5321 E-Mail [EMAIL

Re: Re: new campaign reform idea

2001-05-26 Thread Jim Devine
Michael wrote: everybody could claim to have donated millions of $. which devalues the actual giving of money in terms of buying influence. Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~JDevine

Re: Re: Re: new campaign reform idea

2001-05-26 Thread Michael Perelman
Exactly what I meant. Sort of like making the billionaires for Bush/Gore indistinguishable from the real donors. On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 09:32:40AM -0700, Jim Devine wrote: Michael wrote: everybody could claim to have donated millions of $. which devalues the actual giving of money in

new campaign reform idea

2001-05-25 Thread Jim Devine
from SLATE: Don't Ask, Don't Tell Campaign-Finance Reform Would it make politics cleaner? I dunno. By Steven E. Landsburg Steven E. Landsburg is the author, most recently, of Fair Play: What Your Child Can Teach You About Economics, Values, and the Meaning of Life. You can e-mail him at

Re: new campaign reform idea

2001-05-25 Thread Andrew Hagen
On Fri, 25 May 2001 16:44:49 -0700, Jim Devine wrote: [Anonymous donantions of unlimited amounts.] A trusted financial institution say Vanguard sets up accounts in the names of all recognized candidates. If you want to contribute to Bush, you write a check to Vanguard with instructions to