[was: something about Thomas Frank]
cc writes:Now I leaped a few stages there, and left productive and
unproductive undefined. Those steps ought to be filled in -- BUT NOT
BY TRYING TO MAKE _ECONOMIC_ SENSE. As soon as you try to prove or
disprove this as a statement about technical economics you
Speaking of unproductive labour, I just posted to another mailing list --
swt, shorter worktime list -- a draft essay about a seminal discussion of
unproductive labour, fictitious capital, inconvertible paper money and
superfluous things. It's an introductory essay to Charles Wentworth Dilke's
Tom deserves a note of thanks for posting this valuable literature. Going to the
site, I found that you can also find a pin-up of Tom.
http://www.worklessparty.org/tomwalker.shtml
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail
