Budget Blast

2000-02-09 Thread Max Sawicky

http://www.newsday.com/coverage/current/editorial/wednesday/nd679.htm



Re: Re: Re: smartness

2000-02-09 Thread Doug Henwood

Jim Devine wrote:

Brad asks:
Why is there this extraordinary--eager--desire to take Keynes's 
quote out of context?

Unfortunately, Brad, quoting out of context is a major indoor sport. 
Marx is quoted out of context more than most. Keynes is hardly the 
only target. Worse are made-up quotes, as seen in the book THEY 
DIDN'T SAY THAT.

Keynes himself fell for that quote attributed to Lenin, about how the 
surest way to destroy a country is to debase its currency, something 
Lenin apparently never said.

Doug



Re: Re: smartness

2000-02-09 Thread Jim Devine

Brad asks:
Why is there this extraordinary--eager--desire to take Keynes's quote out 
of context?

Unfortunately, Brad, quoting out of context is a major indoor sport. Marx 
is quoted out of context more than most. Keynes is hardly the only target. 
Worse are made-up quotes, as seen in the book THEY DIDN'T SAY THAT.

Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
http://clawww.lmu.edu/Faculty/JDevine/JDevine.html



Business Economics Conf / Los Angeles - July 2000

2000-02-09 Thread Helen Kantarelis

CALL FOR ABSTRACTS/PAPERS. The 2000 Business  Economics Society International
Conference will be held in Los Angeles / California - USA (Hyatt Regency Hotel)
July 22-26. You may participate as panel organizer, presenter
of one or two papers, chair, moderator, discussant, or observer. The
deadline for abstract submission and participation is March 30, 2000.
All papers will pass a blind peer review process for publication consideration
in the 'GLOBAL BUSINESS  ECONOMICS REVIEW - ANTHOLOGY 2000', a volume of
selected papers from the Conference. For more information please contact
Helen Kantarelis through

  Regular Mail:

  Business  Economics Society International
  c/o Helen Kantarelis
  64 Holden Street
  Worcester, MA 01605-3109, USA

  Tel: (508) 595-0089
  or E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The WEB SITE for BESI is:
http://www.assumption.edu/html/faculty/kantar/missb1.html



Re: Budget Blast

2000-02-09 Thread Edwin Dickens

Congratulations Max on a great piece.  One thing though.  Given your
insistence on politics as having to do with the possible, why do you think
Congress will go for greater spending on child care etc.?  In other words,
why do you think the Democrats are wrong to think that, if they abandon the
call for paying down the debt, they'll be outmaneuvered into large tax cuts
for the rich rather than more social spending?

Edwin (Tom) Dickens

Max Sawicky wrote:
 
 http://www.newsday.com/coverage/current/editorial/wednesday/nd679.htm



RE: Re: Budget Blast

2000-02-09 Thread Max Sawicky

Thanks Tom.

This year I don't think much will
happen, as per the wrestling match
point.  After the ritual grunting
and hair pulling, the parties will
default to big debt
reduction.  

An exception is a likely
expansion of the minimum wage.  This
gives the Repugs a chance to give some
new tax breaks to "small" business.
The budgetary implications will be
small.  The Repugs don't want to give
the Dems the min wage issue for the
fall.

Large tax cuts are dead dead dead.
Just ask Steve Forbes or Bob Dole.
Or watch
Junior Bush sink in South Carolina
like he did in New Hampshire.

I keep coming back to the fact that the
drive for debt repayment seems to indicate
something new in deep U.S. political economy.
I don't know exactly what.  Foregoing a
possible expansion of the public sector is
obvious enough, but we weren't getting that
anyway.

mbs

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Edwin Dickens
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2000 4:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PEN-L:16171] Re: Budget Blast


Congratulations Max on a great piece.  One thing though.  Given your
insistence on politics as having to do with the possible, why do you think
Congress will go for greater spending on child care etc.?  In other words,
why do you think the Democrats are wrong to think that, if they abandon the
call for paying down the debt, they'll be outmaneuvered into large tax cuts
for the rich rather than more social spending?

Edwin (Tom) Dickens

Max Sawicky wrote:
 
 http://www.newsday.com/coverage/current/editorial/wednesday/nd679.htm



Drazen's new book?

2000-02-09 Thread Joel Blau

In the new Princeton University Press economics catalogue, they are featuring
a new book by Allan Drazen entitled Political Economy in Macroeconomics.
Does anyone know anything about this book? Does it represent an attempt
to reclaim "political economy" from the left?

Joel Blau




re: A snapshot of today

2000-02-09 Thread Timework Web

Rob Schaap wrote,
  
 * Yahoo hack has (surprisingly) surprised people such that the
 possibility of the medium of their optimism (the Net) actually being
 quite vulnerable has become apparent (Beeb World Service);

The hacking has now persisted for three days and is being blamed for
declines in NASDAQ stocks (not that one should believe the talking
heads). I have no idea whether the hacking is politically motivated or,
should I say, informed in any way by political consciousness. But there is
a possibility that it is or that it may start people thinking about the
political possibilities of cyber-sabotage. I would be very surprised if
the CIA and other spy agencies haven't developed capabilities for hacking
and harrassing dissident internet communications. Let's not forget the
original post-nuclear war function of this ARPA-net thingy, after all.

Tom Walker



Re: re: A snapshot of today

2000-02-09 Thread Jim Devine


  I would be very surprised if
the CIA and other spy agencies haven't developed capabilities for hacking
and harrassing dissident internet communications.

didn't they do that against Serbia?

Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://liberalarts.lmu.edu/~jdevine



Re: Drazen's new book?

2000-02-09 Thread Jim Devine

In the new Princeton University Press
economics catalogue, they are featuring a new book by Allan Drazen
entitled Political Economy in Macroeconomics. Does anyone know
anything about this book? Does it represent an attempt to reclaim
political economy from the left? 
I don't know that book (and would be interested in hearing about it), but
political economy was rescued from the left a long time ago,
by people like James Buchanan and the Virginia school. 

Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
http://liberalarts.lmu.edu/~jdevine



Re: Re: Drazen's new book?

2000-02-09 Thread Joel Blau

Sure, but from the blurb, this book looks like more than simple public
choice theory. "He proposes that conflict or heterogeneity of interests
should be the field's essential organizing principle, because political
questions arise only when people disagree over which economic policies
should be enacted or how economic costs and benefits should be distributed."
The "interests" are certainly there, but the tone of the blurb (and it
may be inaccurate or incomplete) sounds more synthesized and middle of
the road than classic Buchanan.

Joel Blau

Jim Devine wrote:

In the new Princeton University Press economics
catalogue, they are featuring a new book by Allan Drazen entitled Political
Economy in Macroeconomics. Does anyone know anything about this book?
Does it represent an attempt to reclaim "political economy" from the left?


I don't know that book (and would be interested in hearing about it),
but political economy was "rescued" from the left a long time ago, by people
like James Buchanan and the Virginia school.Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://liberalarts.lmu.edu/~jdevine



Re: Repeal of Glass-Steagell

2000-02-09 Thread Jim Devine

Tom, I think a short summary of what it does would help the whole list (at 
least those of us USians). So if someone knows...

At 02:49 PM 2/9/00 -0800, you wrote:
Does anybody know of articles on what exactly the banking legislation
passed in the fall says and does?  To avoid clutter, please respond
off-list.

Edwin (Tom) Dickens

Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://liberalarts.lmu.edu/~jdevine



Re: Re: Repeal of Glass-Steagell

2000-02-09 Thread Finmktctr

The Financial Markets Center web site has a Glass-Steagall Repeal page at 
http://www.fmcenter.org/fmc_superpage.asp?ID=245

The page contains summaries (short and long) of major provisions in the 
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, analysis, links and updates on rulemaking related to 
GLB



Re: Re: Re: Repeal of Glass-Steagell

2000-02-09 Thread Edwin Dickens

Many thanks.  This is great stuff.

Edwin (Tom) Dickens


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 The Financial Markets Center web site has a Glass-Steagall Repeal page at
 http://www.fmcenter.org/fmc_superpage.asp?ID=245
 
 The page contains summaries (short and long) of major provisions in the
 Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, analysis, links and updates on rulemaking related to
 GLB



Re: RE: Re: Budget Blast

2000-02-09 Thread Edwin Dickens

Max Sawicky wrote:
 
snip 
 
 I keep coming back to the fact that the
 drive for debt repayment seems to indicate
 something new in deep U.S. political economy.
 I don't know exactly what.  
 
snip

A labor movement on the defensive, perhaps?  If the so-called Keynesian
Revolution in fiscal policy was designed to disorganize the only labor
offensive in United States history--as some of us have argued, then
something similar to the Keynesian Revolution may only be possible if labor
succeeds in its current organizing drive.

Edwin (Tom) Dickens



Manufacturing Consent (Chomsky) on TV tonight and tomorrow

2000-02-09 Thread David Dorkin

For anyone who is interested and has Dishnetwork, Direct tv, or
Worldlink tv on his or her cable system, Manufacturing Consent is on the
Worldlink tv channel (a relatively new public network) tonight and twice
tomorrow as well

http://worldlinktv.com/



China: State-owned firms left behind as dependence on US grows

2000-02-09 Thread Stephen E Philion

Hopefully we can convince the good cadres to stop the bad cadres and then
this problem can be solved.Steve

South China Morning Post

Friday, February 4 6:44 AM SGT

State-owned firms left behind as dependence on US grows

The imports and exports of foreign-invested joint ventures in the mainland 
exceeded those of state companies last year for the first time, while the 
country's dependence on the United States as an export market increased.

Figures released yesterday showed imports and exports of joint ventures 
reached US$174.5 billion, an increase of 10.7 per cent over 1998 and 
accounting for 48.4 per cent of the national total, up from 39 per cent in 
1995.

Exports were $88.63 billion, up 9.5 per cent from 1998 and accounting for 
45.5 per cent of the national total. The net increase of $7.69 billion 
during the year accounted for 70 per cent of the growth for exports as a 
whole. Their imports were $85.88 billion, an increase of 11.9 per cent.

The figures indicate the increasing importance of joint ventures to the 
mainland's export drive. They also show that foreign-invested firms are 
better able to compete in the global market than state-owned companies.

Many joint ventures were set up to produce exports, with companies 
relocating plants from Hong Kong, Japan, Taiwan, South Korea and other 
countries to take advantage of the mainland's cheap land and labour.

Last year was a good trade year for the mainland. It posted its 
third-biggest surplus on record, with growth in major markets, despite the 
effects of the Asian financial crisis and the fact that it did not devalue 
its currency, like many of its Asian competitors.

It recorded a trade surplus of $29.2 billion, on exports of $194.93 
billion, up 6.1 per cent on 1998, and imports of $165.71 billion, up 18.2 
per cent.

The mainland's reliance on the US as an export market continued to grow. 
Exports last year were $41.94 billion, an increase of 10.5 per cent, and 
accounting for 21.5 per cent of total exports, up from 18.5 per cent in 1993.

Its trade surplus with the US was $22.4 billion, with imports rising 15.7 
per cent to $19.53 billion. US figures show a substantially higher surplus 
because they include mainland goods shipped through other places, 
principally Hong Kong.

The US was the mainland's second-biggest trading partner, after Japan and 
ahead of the European Union. Trade with Japan was $66.16 billion, an 
increase of 14.2 per cent over 1998, with the US at $61.42 billion, up 12 
per cent, and with the EU $55.7 billion, up 13.9 per cent.



Re: Drazen's new book?

2000-02-09 Thread JKSCHW

In a message dated 00-02-09 16:37:16 EST, you write:

 In the new Princeton University Press economics catalogue, they are
 featuring a new book by Allan Drazen entitled Political Economy in
 Macroeconomics. Does anyone know anything about this book? Does it
 represent an attempt to reclaim "political economy" from the left?
 
 Joel Blau 

Oh, the term "political economy" is not trademarked. I can think of a half 
dpzen squarely liberal. nonradical books in political science that have it in 
their titles. --jks



RE: Re: Re: Drazen's new book?

2000-02-09 Thread Max B. Sawicky



In the 
public choice area can be found moderate
and 
liberal perspectives. It is true that in the field
can be 
found more Buchanan types, but its not
obvious that this makes it more conservative 
than,
say, 
trade.

If you 
think the state is the executive committee
of the 
bourgeoisie, than you are a public choice
theorist too.

There's a lot of good stuff in the field, IMO. I 
got
a dose 
of it from people like Mancur Olson and
Dennis 
Mueller, who are quite different from
the 
Buchanan people. One a these days I may
do a 
number on it myself.

mbs


-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On 
Behalf Of Joel BlauSent: Wednesday, February 09, 2000 6:10 
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [PEN-L:16180] Re: 
Re: Drazen's new book?Sure, but from the blurb, this 
book looks like more than simple public choice theory. "He proposes that 
conflict or heterogeneity of interests should be the field's essential 
organizing principle, because political questions arise only when people 
disagree over which economic policies should be enacted or how economic costs 
and benefits should be distributed." The "interests" are certainly there, but 
the tone of the blurb (and it may be inaccurate or incomplete) sounds more 
synthesized and middle of the road than classic Buchanan. 
Joel Blau 
Jim Devine wrote: 
 
  In the new Princeton University Press economics 
catalogue, they are featuring a new book by Allan Drazen entitled 
Political Economy in Macroeconomics. Does anyone know anything about 
this book? Does it represent an attempt to reclaim "political economy" from 
the left?
  I don't know that book (and would be interested in hearing about it), but 
  political economy was "rescued" from the left a long time ago, by people like 
  James Buchanan and the Virginia school.Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   http://liberalarts.lmu.edu/~jdevine 



Re: Re: Re: smartness

2000-02-09 Thread Brad De Long

Brad De Long wrote:

Why is there this extraordinary--eager--desire to take Keynes's
quote out of context?

Remarkable, isn't it? Didn't Hayek offer the charming interpretation
that Keynes's queerness made him not care about the future?

Doug

I missed this. Where?

Brad DeLong



More Trademark Insanity

2000-02-09 Thread Nathan Newman


Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2000 16:20:04 +0100
From: Annick Bureaud [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Syndicate: Proces contre Leonardo / Leonardo under attack

LEONARDO SUED !


ENGLISH PRESS RELEASE

PRESS RELEASE   FEBRUARY 2000


LEONARDO
French Association Founded in 1967 and On the Web Since 1994
Under Legal Attack for Using the Name " Leonardo "

Court Suit Threatens the Existence of a Non-Profit Organization
Dedicated to Bringing Together Art and the New Technologies
For the Past 30 Years


THE FACTS

On November 3, 1999 a bailiff and eight policemen carried out a
search directed against the Leonardo Association, raiding a private
residence.  This highly unusual procedure was followed by the filing
of a lawsuit against Leonardo by the Transasia Corporation and two
co-complainants.

Transasia has just recently registered the names Leonardo, Leonardo
Finance, Leonardo Partners, Leonardo Invest and Leonardo Experts in
France.  It is suing Leonardo  for a million dollars in damages and
interest on the grounds of trademark infringement.

Their basic argument is that a search engine request using the keyword
"Leonardo" brings up not only the Transasia's sites but also the Web
sites affiliated with the Leonardo arts organization.

As part of this suit, Transasia has asked that Leonardo be forbidden
to use the word "Leonardo," not only on its Web sites, but in any of
its products and services, including its publications.  This strikes
at Leonardo's right to exist.

LEONARDO: for 30 years the world's premier champion of a closer
relationship between the arts and the sciences, providing information,
promoting exchanges and stimulating thinking on both sides.

The Leonardo Association is a French non-profit organization.
Together with the International Society for the Arts, Sciences and
Technology (ISAST), it works to forge an international community of
artists, scientists and students.

John Cage, Franck Popper, R. Buckminster Fuller have participated in
Leonardo, an artistic and academic network founded in Paris during
the 1960s by Frank Malina, a space science pioneer and kinetic artist.
For 30 years now Leonardo has been dedicated to promoting artists
who use science and the new technologies in their work.  Its activity,
long centered on print media, now also includes a Web site and online
publishing.

The broad juridical implications of the Transasia suit are of a matter
of serious concern for all those involved in the Net.  The Leonardo
Association, conscious of what is at stake in this case, is preparing
a legal defense based on three main arguments:

Net Democracy: Forbidding someone to use a particular keyword means
facilitating access to some sites and obstructing access to others.
This is inequitable and contrary to the spirit of democracy that
characterizes the Net.

The principle of antecedence ("first come, first served"): Leonardo
magazine has been published and circulated internationally for
three decades.  It has been available online as an MIT electronic
publication since 1994 (mitpress.mit.edu/Leonardo).

Thus suit betrays a bias in its choice of target: Search engines
looking for the keyword "Leonardo" come up with many Web pages,
some of them dedicated to Leonardo da Vinci and others to Leonardo
DiCaprio!

LEONARDO'S ACTIVITIES

__


(c) OLATS (Observatoire Leonardo des Arts et des Techno-Sciences)
www.olats.org

The Leonardo Observatory for the Arts, Sciences and Technology (OLATS)
is a research group whose work is presented on a mainly French-
language Web site.  OLATS offers information, guidance and potential
links between the arts and science and technology.  It encourages
the production of technologically-based artworks and helps bring
scientists and artists together.  This site is affiliated with the
Leonardo Association, which for 30 years now has played a major role
in providing information, promoting exchanges and stimulating thinking
on both sides.

 The VIRTUAL AFRICA Project
Virtual Africa is a multimedia project whose mission is to build
bridges between artists and intellectuals in Africa and the rest of
the world.

In January 2000, OLATS/Virtual Africa sponsored The River Festival,
in which a group of international artists, most of them working in
new media, gathered to travel down the Mouhoun River in Burkina Faso
and meet with their counterparts in that country.  Together they
have produced artwork in the villages and hold workshops with local
artists, school children and street kids.  In November-December 2000
and May-June 2001, all of these artists will tour Europe.

 The PIONEERS  PRECURSORS Project
Technological art has a past, but does it have a memory ?  Through
rigorous online documentation, the PIONEERS  PATHBREAKERS Project
aims to resituate the importance of artists such as Nicolas
Schoffer, Nam June Paik, Rauschenberg, Stockhausen, Takis, Tinguely,
whose thoughts and work were so influential for the evolution of

Pessimism over Japan

2000-02-09 Thread Louis Proyect

NY Times op-ed, February 9, 2000

RECKONINGS / By PAUL KRUGMAN

The Japan Syndrome

When Japan's Kansai International Airport was being planned, there was
considerable uncertainty over how much the artificial island on which it
sits would sink. The officials in charge chose to accept the lowest, most
favorable estimate; as it turned out, the reality has been worse than even
the most pessimistic estimate, and despite expensive emergency measures --
and continual assurances from those officials that everything is under
control -- the island is still sinking. 

It's not a bad metaphor for the story of Japanese economic policy in recent
years. Japan's government keeps on insisting that its economic strategy has
put the nation on the road to sustained recovery, brushing aside both the
doubts of outside economists and the growing evidence that the strategy is
not, in fact, working. For most of the past year this unwarranted
confidence has been supported by a strange consensus on the part of
investment analysts, who somehow became committed as a group to the view
that Japan's economy is on the mend. 

And so it came as a shock last Sunday when a senior official admitted that
the Japanese economy has almost certainly been shrinking for the last two
quarters, which means that by the usual definition it has slipped back into
recession. 

Japan has the dubious distinction of being the first major nation since the
1930's to experience a "liquidity trap," in which even cutting the interest
rate all the way to zero doesn't induce enough business investment to
restore full employment. The result is an economy that has been depressed
since the early 90's, and that in 1998 seemed to be on the verge of a
catastrophic deflationary spiral...

Full article at:
http://www.nytimes.com/library/opinion/krugman/020900krug.html


Louis Proyect

(The Marxism mailing list: http://www.marxmail.org)