s. Chomsky endorses the argument.
Link: http://www.press.uillinois.edu/s03/dawson.html
or look on Powell's or Amazon.
Thanks for your attention, and I'd welcome your
feedback.
In Solidarity,
Michael Dawson
Portland, OR,
USA
Troy wrote: "I'd like to hear any critiques from anyone on this
list."
Here's a simple one: "ParEcon" -- This sounds
Stalinist/Sovietesque. For a program that seeks to transcend socialism's
equation with the USSR, this a rather bad thing.
Moore needs to answer for what he
has said, and needs to be urged to repair the damage that he has
done.
I disagree with your conclusion here, and with your seeming belief that
Moore has a thesis that Mumia is guilty. What Moore was doing was saying
he personally thinks Mumia is guilty, on the
Dan Scanlan wrote: the Democratic Party ... focused on chads and courtroom
tension and ignored the disenfranchisement of blacks and others turned away
from the polls. As usual, the Democratic Party
fought the wrong battle.
Why is the left so bloody silent about the blatantly obvious issue in the
The fact that Gore received more votes than Bush is off-topic?
This interpretation is precisely the problem.
Dear Mr. Proyect: In what sense do you mean
your claim that "urban life is unsustainable?" Do you mean we need better
cities, or that cities themselves have to go? Please clarify. Your
11/27 posting appears to argue against the continued existence of urban living
of any kind. True or
I did not call you an FBI agent on LBO-talk, though I did say you have penis
envy regarding Doug Henwood. Meanwhile, I assume you're too embarrassed by
your own argument that urban life is unsustainable to answer my question.
- Original Message -
From: Louis Proyect [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Moseley re-cast the data into authentic Marxian categories.
I agree with Doug. I also agree with G. Lukacs -- Orthodox Marxism,
therefore, does not imply the uncritical acceptance of the results of Marx's
investigations. It is not the 'belief' in this or that thesis, nor the
exegesis of a
- Original Message -
From: Michael Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PEN-L list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 8:46 PM
Subject: Re: [PEN-L] John Kenneth Galbraith
Galbraith is a treasure. He was also protective of the left during the
60s.
--
Michael Perelman
paul phillips wrote:
Since that time, we have been in a period of demand constraint.
Not hardly in the U.S. The 1990s expansion was the most
consumption-intensive in history. The MPC was something like 104%
measured over the whole cycle. It's been something like 99% since the
early-2001
If we cannot shift the terms of the discussion
away from the individual, we are doomed to fail.
Joanna
Shift all you want. Properly targeted anger, in any form, is verboten in
our corporate media system and its PBS/NPR step-child. Pabulum about
protecting children is political sawdust, and
Q: How many mainstream economists does it take to screw in a lightbulb?
A: Doesn't matter: They all just sit around in the dark waiting for the
Invisible Hand to do it.
Does anybody know the origin of the claim that
"America is engaged in a love affair with the car"?
Was this originally an industry campaign, or did it
just spring from journalism somewhere? I can't seem to find the
root.
Thanks.
-
From: michael perelman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 8:50 AM
Subject: [PEN-L] America's Love Affair with the Car
The ever-energetic Jurriann, asked me to forward this to Michael Dawson,
but I thought it might interest others.
I think you should try
Sorry for the jarring formality. It's just that I've read your books and
articles, and wanted to show my appreciation...
To me, among the many reasons to know about the struggle to keep Britain out
of the U.S. CW is its strong refutation of sophomoric (overstated)
structuralism. History and
Nobody knows where the phrase originated. I'm
going to go spend some time in the stacks trying to figure it
out.
Grant on union decline:
Similar trends abound in the developing world. I think this tells a lot
about the failure of social democracy/labourism/reformism on both the
industrial and political fronts, specifically the theoretical/strategic
bankruptcy of the mainstream left in the late 60s and
17 matches
Mail list logo
